Playing Gotcha With LEI
We've seen a lot of developments this week in legal entity identifier (LEI) world—the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) agreeing on the ISO 17442 standard for the LEI, which marks a positive for progress; the FSB setting a March 2013 deadline for implementation of an LEI system; and the delay of Swift and DTCC's plans for a provisional LEI Utility Portal—a small step backward following those steps forward. But the root of that portal delay is at the feet of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Who would have thought European and global standards bodies, utilities and organizations would have their act together, reach agreements, make decisions and take action before a single US entity did?
Just a week or two ago, it seemed the FSB had draped a veil over the LEI standard by pushing ISO to remove Swift as registration authority. The different authorities may be jockeying for position in the run-up to the G-20 possibly making its own pronouncements or decision about the LEI when it meets on June 18.
Either way, the FSB, ISO, Swift and DTCC appear to have hit the ball back into the CFTC's court. Since the CFTC set up its own interim identifier, expecting the decision-making to take a lot longer, has the US regulatory authority been taken by surprise?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Market participants voice concerns as landmark EU AI Act deadline approaches
Come August, the EU’s AI Act will start to sink its teeth into Europe. Despite the short window, financial firms are still wondering how best to comply.
ICE to seek tokenization approval from SEC under existing federal laws
CEO Jeff Sprecher says the new NYSE tokenization initiative is not dependent on the passage of the US Clarity Act.
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI.
Re-examining Big Tech’s influence over the capital markets
Waters Wrap: A few years ago, it seemed the big cloud providers were positioning themselves to dominate the capital markets tech scene. And then came ChatGPT.
Pressure mounts on Asia to fall in line for T+1
With the US already on a T+1 settlement cycle, and the UK and EU preparing for the shift in 2027, there’s pressure for Asia to follow suit. But moving may involve more risks than expected.
Brokers must shift HFT servers after China colocation ban
New exchange guidance drives rush for “proximity colo” in nearby datacenters.
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk.
New EBA taxonomy could help banks track AI risk
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts.