Here Comes The LEI Flood

Legal entity identifier (LEI) news appeared to reach a fever pitch this month, and that's reflected in this month's issue. This surge was not exactly a complete surprise, as it revolves around the run-up to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) making its recommendations on the LEI to the G-20 in preparation for a decision expected to come out of the organization's summit in Mexico on June 18–19.
There were a few unexpected developments, however, as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) removed Swift from its role as registration authority, at the FSB's request, and Swift and the DTCC postponed the launch of their provisional LEI portal because of complications with the CFTC's interim identifier.
Also, there have been some whispers in the industry about how the LEI will be administered and by whom. Those thoughts haven't been stated formally by those making the LEI decisions or trying to influence them, but a Sifma official said his organization is waiting to see what the FSB will do. Too much may be read into that stance, but it's less than a full-fledged confirmation of the industry's favorites, as backed by the GFMA and Sifma itself: ISO, Swift and ANNA.
Another industry association, ISITC, is getting into the LEI mix with its Regulatory Working Group turning its attention there. And LEI is prominent in the current thinking and concerns of many in the industry, as was made evident in Inside Reference Data's recent webcast on regulation and standards. Panelists in that discussion see significant challenges in complying with an LEI standard.
Tim Lind of Thomson Reuters points to a need to harmonize the various LEI plans proposed by different bodies, such as the aforementioned CFTC interim identifier (CICI), ID numbers for Fatca, tax IDs and large trader identification plans. The panelists also found other issues feeding into the LEI debate, such as addressing inaccurate or missing data and combining LEI projects with business requirement work.
The current LEI drive, which appears very close to completion—and meeting the FSB imperative for March 2013 implementation—may well be nearing its decisive moments that will lock it in as a reality for the industry. It's only a hunch, but Inside Reference Data expects to see just as much or more news about LEI in the coming month.
With the LEI sucking up so much oxygen, one might think there is nothing else of importance being discussed in the data realm, but that would be wrong. The June issue of Inside Reference Data also covers enterprise data management (EDM) developments and trends, starting with a greater push behind the Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO), and the increased role data management is playing in risk management. These stories were on the minds of presenters at our North American Financial Information Summit (NAFIS) last month. If you missed the event, these pieces should give you a read on how risk may dictate what data projects progress. Risk applications are requiring data models that break down or bypass silos, with proper controls now in place to make that safe. And the LEI won't be the only data relevant to using EDM to support risk management.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Asic probe piles pressure on ASX to deliver Chess replacement
But market insiders think late intervention by regulators could even slow down implementation.
Stakes raised for UK bond, EU derivatives tapes after Ediphy clinches win
The pressure is on for TransFICC, Etrading, Finbourne, and Propellant Digital, who are still vying to provide the UK’s fixed income consolidated tape after Esma awarded the EU’s tape to Ediphy and its partners.
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.