IBOR I/O

An interesting wrinkle that emerged during Waters' recent breakfast discussion of the Investment Book of Record (IBOR) method of data management that appears to be taking hold in the industry, was whether firms should place responsibility for IBOR implementation in the front, middle or back office.
With IBOR's reference data nature, one would think it most likely would be a back-office responsibility. One might also guess that given the nature of front-office IT resources, or lack thereof, that IBOR might be a tall order for front offices. As Sylvain Pendaries, vice-president of front office and analytics at the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), a $76 billion Canadian fund, who recently remade IBOR at the fund, told attendees, PSP only has two developers on its front-office team. Most of the front-office is analysts, quants and portfolio managers.
As a result, for PSP and similarly structured front offices, they must either draw on IT resources elsewhere in their firm, or outsource. Pendaries believes that the prerequisite for deciding whether to buy or build for an IBOR is clarity about roles and responsibilities in the firm throughout the trade life cycle. "Once you know you have no liabilities, then you can look for outsourcing solutions," he said. "But don't do that unless you know the vulnerabilities in your organization."
A firm's front office may already be satisfied with the systems it has, as Eagle Investment Systems' Mal Cullen pointed out. An IBOR project can require implementation of multiple systems in succession, or leveraging of systems investments over time. As Bob Leaper of DST said, such projects stand a better chance of gaining traction if they are divided into shorter-term phases of three to six months each, with concrete results shown after each stage.
Another inherent challenge with an IBOR is the need for data warehousing to accommodate the large amounts of data necessary to maintain such a resource. The real-time nature of front-office needs means systems must be capable of delivering intra-day updates to and from the IBOR, keeping up with transactions that are happening.
Practically, IBOR is going to have to be operated and managed by the back office. That part of a firm is best suited to run IBOR because it has more time and expertise. That does not absolve front offices of responsibility, however. They must be sure they have a handle on IBOR output and work with their back-office colleagues to keep IBOR input and output flowing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Texting trials, or ‘The case of the costly Cubans’
The IMD Wrap: This week, featuring my colleagues as guest stars, I put myself in the shoes of a communications compliance officer at an asset manager, and look at what happens when messages go awry.
Standard Chartered CDO on AI, CAT on life support, Paxos files for clearing status, and more
The Waters Cooler: FIX updates MMT, a Finnish datacenter hangs in the balance, and partnerships galore in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 327: Standard Chartered’s Mo Rahim
He joins the podcast to discuss data and AI governance and guardrails for AI.
Messaging’s chameleon: The changing faces and use cases of ISO 20022
The standard is being enhanced beyond its core payments messaging function to be adopted for new business needs.
S&P Global details AI partnerships, LLM advancements
The data provider has partnered with Microsoft and Anthropic to use hyperscaler tech to boost its AI offerings.
The industry is not ready for what’s around the corner
Waters Wrap: As cloud usage and AI capabilities continue to evolve (and costs go up), Anthony believes the fintech industry may face a similar predicament to the one facing journalism today.
Overbond’s demise hints at cloud-cost complexities
The fixed-income analytics platform provider shuttered after failing to find new funding or a merger partner as costs for its serverless cloud infrastructure “ballooned.”
ViaNexus aims to bring data entitlement control to MCP, agentic AI
The startup believes that Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol marks a major step forward for agentic AI, but the market data industry has its own complexities that haven’t been addressed—yet.