BCBS 239 Wasn't The Start of Risk Data Aggregation
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), with its BCBS 239 "Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting," [as covered in "Impactful Actions," a feature Nicholas Hamilton wrote in April], has set out a January 1, 2016 deadline for firms to comply with its prescription for tracking risk through collection and management of relevant data.
BCBS 239 sets out 14 principles, including several that could be described as simple ideals, such as completeness, timeliness, adaptability, accuracy, being comprehensive in nature, clarity, usefulness and higher frequency. BCBS 239 is also effectively a corollary to the committee's Basel III capital adequacy regulation, which stopped at mandating that firms have enough resources to cover their risk, not getting into how they may actually determine or monitor that risk.
The discussion in Inside Reference Data's May 15 webcast, sponsored by S&P Capital IQ, indicated that with risk data aggregation, the industry appears to be making progress at managing multiple types of data and reacting to regulatory mandates such as those contained in BCBS 239. Still, there may be some pushback against the 2016 deadline, as experienced chief data officer John Bottega, now a senior advisor for the EDM Council, said in a May 14 webcast covering compliance data issues, organized by data management automation provider Collibra and financial industry advisory company Element 22. "It won't happen by 2016," he says. "It will take some time."
Bottega correctly notes that the goals set out in BCBS 239 are vague. "It's hard to pinpoint because the specifics of what's considered adherence or what constitutes adherence, is still up for grabs," he says. "There are still a lot of conversations going."
Still, others see BCBS 239 as more of a symptom that risk data aggregation efforts have hit a tipping point. "A lot of firms are in the process of working on data management and governance," said Peter Serenita, group chief data officer at HSBC in New York, during the May 14 webcast. "Even before BCBS 239, data value had reached a level higher than ever before in organizations. ... BCBS 239 is a reinforcement of what needed to be done and was being done in a lot of places."
If BCBS 239 is simply ratifying improvements that the industry already has underway, it doesn't seem logical that there would be as much pushback by the industry. And where standards and guidelines such as same-day trade settlement have languished for years, more recent regulatory mandates, namely the US Fatca tax withholding rules, only had key deadlines delayed slightly – in terms more like weeks or months, rather than years. Therefore, those who are unprepared to follow BCBS 239 standards shouldn't count on a delay by its authors before 2016 arrives.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Americans voted against datacenters. Datacenters may still win.
The Waters Wrap: The US midterms could spell trouble for datacenters but only if Dems put the screws to Big Tech, too, Reb writes.
Asia’s T+1 journey splinters as Hong Kong delays and Malaysia mulls
APAC markets are setting their own timelines for shorter settlement, while Deutsche Bank proposes an “earlier certainty” mechanism to ease the cross-border strain.
The SEC’s innovation exemption is facing its first test
Waters Wrap: With more than 20 issuer companies submitting objections to OKX and ICE’s new joint venture for tokenizing stocks, Nyela wonders if some cracks are starting to show in the regulator's innovation exemption.
AI regulation: Who’s responsible for eliminating ‘gray areas’?
The Waters Wrap: In light of the Hugging Face hack and similar incidents involving rogue AI agents, Anthony wonders whether industry regulators will take the reins.
Goldman exec: Dec. 6 a ‘lighthouse’ for EU T+1 readiness
Officials from JP Morgan, the European Central Bank, the National Securities Depository, and Goldman Sachs explained how T+1 preparation needs to be different in the EU than in the US, while speaking at Sibos.
Federal court moves to certify class in Cusip antitrust suit
The SDNY judge has handed a procedural win to plaintiffs, allowing swaths of end-user firms and third-party data vendors to join the class action.
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting.
Reasoning agents enter the onboarding process for banks
The next phase for banks in the KYC/AML space will be using agentic AI to replace sequential, siloed checks with orchestrator agents, IBM technologists say.