Going on the Offense
Data management proves more effective when stakeholders take an active interest
At this week's Risk Data Aggregation breakfast briefing hosted by Inside Reference Data and sponsored by Numerix and S&P Capital IQ, John Bottega, senior consultant at the EDM Council, urged attendees to take an "offensive posture" (as opposed to "defensive" reaction to regulation) in their data management efforts.
The challenge in trying to take that offensive approach is the number of parties within a firm that all have an ownership interest in the data, as Ulku Rowe, managing director, credit risk technology, JPMorgan, pointed out. "Now, when there is a problem, there are 15 people you have to call, and you're trying to figure out who understands it," she said. "It takes a village of people—but this is a village without a phone book. You need to know who owns the parts of the data."
To go on the offense—and weave through multiple parties who are interested in the data to find the ones who are most relevant—constant assessment is necessary, as Sumanda Basu, senior vice president of internal audit and data governance at Citi, described. "I ask people in my business if they have really spoken to their customers, who may be in enterprise risk, and asked what they want, what particular data they have and what they want from it."
People who are having issues with data are asked if they have really exchanged information about the boundaries of their data and if they have incorporated others' departments into their infrastructure. In many cases, they have not, Basu related. "Data is not there in most of the important developments," he said. "The most important thing is to talk with internal customers in your organization about what they need. Their requirements become your requirements for infrastructure. Take ownership from there."
Numerix chief strategy officer Satyam Kancharla amplifies this thought, saying the major issues are not technology issues, but related to people, processes and incentives. "Tie it back to what the business wants to do and what the business priorities are," he said. "There has to be business sponsorship at the highest level."
Taking an "offensive posture" in data management means consistently thinking about the data issues in terms of the people in the organization with interests in the data, assessing their needs and issues, and directing the data through the mazes that often exist in large organizations.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Can mastering data solve AI’s cognitive dissonance?
The IMD Wrap: Bank execs are still bullish on AI, but recent studies suggest it’s not the panacea they’re making it out to be. Can the two views be rectified?
Everything you need to know about market data in overnight equities trading
As overnight trading continues to capture attention, a growing number of data providers are taking in market data from alternative trading systems.
AI strategies could be pulling money into the data office
Benchmarking: As firms formalize AI strategies, some data offices are gaining attention and budget.
Identity resolution is key to future of tokenization
Firms should think not only about tokenization’s potential but also the underlying infrastructure and identity resolution, writes Cusip Global Services’ Matthew Bastian in this guest column.
Vendors are winning the AI buy-vs-build debate
Benchmarking: Most firms say proprietary LLM tools make up less than half of their AI capabilities as they revaluate earlier bets on building in-house.
Private markets boom exposes data weak points
As allocations to private market assets grow and are increasingly managed together with public market assets, firms need systems that enable different data types to coexist, says GoldenSource’s James Corrigan.
Banks hate data lineage, but regulators keep demanding it
Benchmarking: As firms automate regulatory reporting, a key BCBS 239 requirement is falling behind, raising questions about how much lineage banks really need.
TMX eyes global expansion in 2026 through data offering
The exchange operator bought Verity last fall in an expansion of its Datalinx business with a goal of growing it presence outside of Canada.