October 2015: Tamper at Your Peril
In our industry, mergers and acquisitions are a fact of life. They’re a sign that the industry is maturing, and that entities—be they capital markets firms or third-party technology vendors who serve them—have created something of value that someone else wants.
More than a decade ago, I remember sitting down with Gavin Lavelle, CEO of SunGard’s Panorama business unit at the time, where we attempted to establish the number of technology firms SunGard had acquired since its founding back in 1983 when it was spun off from the Sun Oil Company. We lost count somewhere between 150 and 160, illustrating the extent to which the firm had already grown through acquisition. Clearly, SunGard is an extreme example, but it does illustrate the extent to which M&A activity has shaped, and will continue to shape, our industry.
However, mergers and acquisitions tend to be troublesome beasts. They are often badly handled affairs that in many instances yield divisiveness and an “us and them” culture as opposed to one of unity and co-operation. While pretty much all M&A plans appear simple to execute when they are hatched, when it comes to bedding down one culture—along with its history, idiosyncrasies and objectives—within another, things can go pear-shaped pretty quickly.
As Investit’s Catherine Doherty explains in David Dawkins’ M&A feature on page 16, there exists a temptation to “fiddle” with an organization once it has been subsumed by a larger entity, an itch that clearly large numbers of technology firms cannot resist scratching. This fiddling might entail repositioning or rebranding products, or it might involve replacing key staff members who appear to be surplus to requirements. It might even involve something as drastic as mothballing existing offerings and migrating clients to alternative platforms.
Whatever the case, fiddling invariably leads to diluting the acquired firm’s secret sauce, which often proves debilitating, if not terminal. In most instances, fiddling tends not to be good for anyone—the acquirer, the acquiree, and especially their clients.
So what’s the answer? In short, acquirers should keep their fiddling to a minimum. Ideally, products and their owners should be left to operate in pretty much the same environment as they were used to, where they can adhere to their research and development schedules and client-interfacing activities that had served them so well over the years. Naturally, there will be synergies between the two firms and those need to be acknowledged, but in most instances, the rule of thumb is thus: If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
This Week: ION/LuxSE, BNY Mellon, Nasdaq, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Nasdaq to market new options strike listing tech to other exchanges
The exchange operator is experimenting with emerging technologies to determine which options strike prices belong in a crowded market, with hopes to sell the tech to its peers.
Former Goldman analyst aims to blend GenAI and synthetic data with start-up
Synthera.ai is taking a novel approach to calculating risk. While promising, industry observers are skeptical.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Bloomberg’s Tony McManus
Tony McManus, global head of enterprise data division at Bloomberg, joins the podcast to talk about the importance of data in the context of AI and GenAI.
Devil’s Bargain: Closed architecture systems will derail AI ambitions
Rob Flatley explains why closed-off systems will fall flat when it comes to AI adoption.
This Week: First Trust/Bloomberg/New Constructs, Cboe/Metaurus, LTX/MultiLynq, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters
Frank Tarsillo, CTO at S&P Global Market Intelligence, joins the podcast to discuss the firm’s approach to AI, the importance of data, and what might be in store for datacenters in the coming years.
BMO’s cloud migration strategy eases AI adoption
The Canadian bank is embracing a more digital future as its cloud strategy makes gains and it looks to both traditional machine learning and generative AI for further augmentation.
Most read
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: Bloomberg’s Tony McManus
- IMD & IRD Awards 2024: All the winners
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters