Analyzing direct and indirect global networks to understand true risk exposure -- special report
Click here to download the PDF
Web of Influence
The expansion of the global economy in recent decades has been underpinned by the multitude of relationships that have formed between companies at an international level. In many industries, the idea of focusing solely on local networks of consumers and suppliers has become a relic of the pre-internet age-the web has allowed businesses to leap oceans, attracting consumers and forging relationships that span the globe. A manufacturer in the UK can easily develop a US market for its products, just as a US retailer can now cost-effectively source products or services on the other side of the world.
But as these networks grow in size and complexity, what does this mean for investors? Investment companies must be able to access accurate, real-time data, not only on direct interests such as portfolio companies, but also on relevant third parties to these companies, including suppliers, consumers, and competitors. The advent of globalization in this respect also necessitates an in-depth understanding of geographical risk. For example, investing in a company with a significant stake in China requires robust methods for tracking Chinese economic data.
This report examines current risk management trends among investment companies relating to indirect relationships and geopolitics. For insight into how leading investment companies are tackling these areas of risk management, a virtual roundtable on page 8, conducted with a range of experts, outlines industry best practice in relation to managing macro and micro risks. How do leading asset managers monitor, manage and mitigate the many risks stemming from their global investment portfolios? To what extent should investment companies research the business networks of the organizations in which they hold a stake? Inside Reference Data also conducted an exclusive online survey to examine the challenges involved in finding the right tools and data to effectively monitor and mitigate these risks. Starting on page 5, the published results detail current trends in relation to country and third-party risk management.
The likely level of demand for ways to manage this type of risk-both now and in the future-is also discussed. Finally, on page 13, an article by report sponsor FactSet outlines how and why investment professionals should analyze indirect business networks in order to understand true risk exposure.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
The Big Bang—a complex 40-year data journey yet to reach its destination
In this guest column, Finbourne’s Gus Sekhon reflects on the deregulation and privatization of the London Stock Exchange and what it meant for data.
Semantic density: old wine, or a new vintage?
Giving AI agents enough context to carry out enterprise tasks has become a priority for firms building them, but it’s expensive. It might not have to be.
Firms get AI access to LSEG data via DataBP admin layer
LSEG has expanded its agreement with DataBP to enable customers’ AI-based tools to request and evaluate data from the exchange and maintain more comprehensive usage records.
Rimes builds agents for exception management
The vendor aims to improve its data foundations to allow for greater agent autonomy.
The great migration: Firms work to integrate ISO 20022
Banks and asset managers are working to adopt the new messaging standard, but it’s easier said than done.
PostSig, CJC team up to run data management for London broker
In the first such deployment between the vendors, CJC will act as an outsourced data administrator using PostSig’s technology to manage the firm’s data.
Buy-side firms warn semantic layers not a quick fix for AI integration
Semantic layers promise to teach AI what a firm’s data means. Keeping that meaning current is the part that may get overlooked, tech heads warn.
Mind the stack: the foundation markets run on
Exchange data is an underappreciated component of the AI era, writes Jeff Kimsey.