Going on the Offense
Data management proves more effective when stakeholders take an active interest
At this week's Risk Data Aggregation breakfast briefing hosted by Inside Reference Data and sponsored by Numerix and S&P Capital IQ, John Bottega, senior consultant at the EDM Council, urged attendees to take an "offensive posture" (as opposed to "defensive" reaction to regulation) in their data management efforts.
The challenge in trying to take that offensive approach is the number of parties within a firm that all have an ownership interest in the data, as Ulku Rowe, managing director, credit risk technology, JPMorgan, pointed out. "Now, when there is a problem, there are 15 people you have to call, and you're trying to figure out who understands it," she said. "It takes a village of people—but this is a village without a phone book. You need to know who owns the parts of the data."
To go on the offense—and weave through multiple parties who are interested in the data to find the ones who are most relevant—constant assessment is necessary, as Sumanda Basu, senior vice president of internal audit and data governance at Citi, described. "I ask people in my business if they have really spoken to their customers, who may be in enterprise risk, and asked what they want, what particular data they have and what they want from it."
People who are having issues with data are asked if they have really exchanged information about the boundaries of their data and if they have incorporated others' departments into their infrastructure. In many cases, they have not, Basu related. "Data is not there in most of the important developments," he said. "The most important thing is to talk with internal customers in your organization about what they need. Their requirements become your requirements for infrastructure. Take ownership from there."
Numerix chief strategy officer Satyam Kancharla amplifies this thought, saying the major issues are not technology issues, but related to people, processes and incentives. "Tie it back to what the business wants to do and what the business priorities are," he said. "There has to be business sponsorship at the highest level."
Taking an "offensive posture" in data management means consistently thinking about the data issues in terms of the people in the organization with interests in the data, assessing their needs and issues, and directing the data through the mazes that often exist in large organizations.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
LSEG partners with Citi, DTCC goes on-chain, AI on the brain, and more
The Waters Cooler: Trading Technologies buys OpenGamma, CT Plan updates, and the beginning of benchmarking in this week’s news roundup.
AI & data enablement: A looming reality or pipe dream?
Waters Wrap: The promise of AI and agents is massive, and real-world success stories are trickling out. But Anthony notes that firms still need to be hyper-focused on getting the data foundation correct before adding layers.
Data managers worry lack of funding, staffing will hinder AI ambitions
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to WatersTechnology’s data benchmark survey rated the pressure they’re receiving from senior executives and the board as very high. But is the money flowing for talent and data management?
Data standardization is the ‘trust accelerator’ for broader AI adoption
In this guest column, data product managers at Fitch Solutions explain AI’s impact on credit and investment risk management.
As AI pressures mount, banks split on how to handle staffing
Benchmarking: Over the next 12 months, almost a third of G-Sib respondents said they plan to decrease headcount in their data function.
Everyone wants to tokenize the assets. What about the data?
The IMD Wrap: With exchanges moving market data on-chain, Wei-Shen believes there’s a need to standardize licensing agreements.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
TCB Data-Broadhead pairing highlights challenges of market data management
Waters Wrap: The vendors are hoping that blending TCB’s reporting infrastructure with Broadhead’s DLT-backed digital contract and auditing engine will be the cure for data rights management.