Indata Releases Mifid II Enhancements for iPM Epic Platform
iPM Epic platform’s compliance, data management and OMS functionality all updated in anticipation of new European regulation due in January 2018.

Greenwich, Conn.-based Indata launched the iPM Epic platform in 2014 and claims to have made 350 alterations to the system ahead of the incoming Mifid II regulation in Europe, with specific focus on the key areas of compliance, data management, and order management system (OMS) enhancements.
Compliance has been enhanced through a series of upgrades to the user interface and data aggregation tools designed to draw in external data feeds for greater granularity within compliance rule calculations, while the platform’s workflows have been streamlined to provide enhanced data capture throughout the back, middle, and front office, with full reconciliation capability and audit trail. The platform’s OMS capabilities have also been updated across the FIX protocol, portfolio modeling and other areas related to trading across asset classes.
“Much of the work that we have done to prepare our clients for Mifid II involves the sophisticated enterprise-wide data management capabilities based on big data technology that are part of our iPM Epic solution, which runs through the front, middle, and back office,” said David Csiki, managing director of Indata, in a statement.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Reporting overhaul: the EU’s near-impossible balancing act
Regulators must weigh their desire to streamline derivatives reporting against the need to gather crucial trade data.
The SIX Digital Assets Regulatory & Tax Service—Simplifying regulatory compliance
SIX‘s Digital Assets Regulatory & Tax Service is designed to simplify regulations and tax directives governing digital assets, making regulatory compliance more straightforward
Ediphy challenges FCA, Sterling launches new OMS, and more
The UK bond tape is halted, LSEG and Databricks partner, Wells Fargo adopts TransFICC’s One API, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 332: DTCC’s Val Wotton
This week, Val Wotton joins the podcast to discuss the necessary steps leading up to the T+1 transitions in the UK and EU.
DORA delay leaves EU banks fighting for their audit rights
The regulation requires firms to expand scrutiny of critical vendors that haven’t yet been identified.
Citi gears up for EU T+1 climb
The bank has a dedicated team examining what it needs to do to ensure a successful transition to T+1 in Europe.
The great disappearing internet—and what it could mean for your LLM
AI-generated content, bots, disinfo, ads, and censorship are killing the internet. As more of life continues to happen online, we might consider whether we’re building castles atop a rotting foundation.
AI’s next gig: The rising cost of off-channel communications compliance
As the cost of analyzing communications increases, what tools can firms deploy to save time and money while avoiding penalties?