Skip to main content

Japanese Securities Firms Consider Taxonomy

The data taxonomy model could ease regulatory compliance pain for securities firms in Japan.

Shinjuku-business-district
Shinjuku business district

In Japan, a single firm could be dealing with 300 to 800 regulatory reports to file, says Ken Utsunomiya, senior executive in the global markets division at Mizuho Securities. “We always need to send the report by the target time or deadline already defined, and if we make a mistake, depending on the criticality or severity of reporting, we may need to resubmit it with an explanation letter, or sometimes with an apology letter,” he says. “If the quality is bad, we may face a penalty.”

That

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Register for free

Access two articles, our IMD and Waters Wraps, plus a member newsletter. Find out more.

All fields are mandatory unless otherwise highlighted.

Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech

Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here