Skip to main content

T+1 in Asia-Pacific: Preparing post-trade operations for what’s ahead

There are benefits of Asia-Pacific markets moving to T+1, but there are unique complexities to tackle, says DTCC’s Val Wotton.

road ahead
Credit: AscentXmedia

With Europe set to transition to T+1 settlement in 2027, the global shift to faster settlement is picking up pace. Shorter settlement cycles are driving the need for robust post-trade automation to enable faster post-trade processing, ensure compliance, and strengthen operational resilience in an increasingly interconnected global marketplace. 

With China and India now at T+0/T+1, it is imperative that Asia-Pacific markets make the transition to T+1 to remain competitive on the global stage.

As discussions around Asia-Pacific’s T+1 transition pick up speed, ValueExchange issued a report, T+1 in Asia-Pacific: Finding a Common Ground, released in November 2025, to gauge industry readiness and facilitate informed dialogue. Drawing on insights from a survey of 244 market participants—including major global firms—the final report reveals critical perspectives and concerns that will shape ongoing conversations. These findings go beyond being informative; they are pivotal in driving meaningful action and operational preparedness across the industry.

The Asia-Pacific reality

The report reinforces findings that will be familiar to those with knowledge of the region. Asia-Pacific’s journey to T+1 is expected to involve unique complexities, as the region’s markets are defined by their diversity—spanning multiple time zones, currencies, varying levels of market maturity, deep market fragmentation, and a patchwork of regulatory frameworks. This diversity is not just a backdrop; it represents the primary barrier to a smooth T+1 transition. 

Firms will need to rethink trade settlement and risk management practices, with the report showing that up to 54% of post-trade processes must speed up their operations to meet tighter deadlines in a T+1 settlement cycle. 

Success will hinge on critical enablers such as automating the setup and maintenance of standard settlement instructions (SSIs), implementing pre-settlement matching of trade allocations and confirmations on trade date (T+0), straight-through processing and eliminating manual workflows—measures that collectively close operational gaps, reduce errors, reinforce operational resilience—to enable a seamless transition. 

Notably, 70% of custodians are particularly concerned with trade fails, which are expected to climb by as much as 25%, pointing to limitations in legacy processes that will struggle to meet accelerated settlement timelines.

The SSI imperative

The findings further highlight that 70% of Asia’s settlement instructions will need to be automated to meet T+1 timelines. Legacy systems and manual interventions are ill-suited for the speed and accuracy required under T+1. Inaccurate or incomplete settlement instructions remain one of the leading causes of settlement failures across the industry, and the compressed timeline leaves little room for error.

The solution is to implement an automated database for storing and sharing SSIs—enabling back-office teams to operate more efficiently and reduce operational risk as critical data can flow seamlessly downstream for settlement processing.

Twin risks

When evaluating T+1 implementation, Asia-Pacific markets may also face heightened settlement risks, particularly around funding mismatches and trade fails. With settlement deadlines as early as 10 am to 1:30 pm local time in some markets under the T+2 regime, firms have approximately one and a half days to match/confirm, fund and settle trades. 

These challenges are most severe in Tier 3 markets. When respondents were asked about the anticipated concerns in a T+1 environment by market profile, 83% cited currency controls and reporting requirements as placing greater strain on funding today. Notably, concern also exists in Tier 2 (69%) and Tier 1 (56%) markets, underscoring that funding constraints and time zone differences are central hurdles in the region.

This is the dilemma. These pressures may translate into higher pre‑funding costs and an increased risk of trade failures, particularly for trades involving offshore counterparties. 

To navigate these challenges, firms can explore strategies such as leveraging auto‑FX solutions, adjusting funding approaches, enhancing liquidity management, or partnering with custodians to identify viable options. The ValueExchange report also points to the importance of ensuring major FX currencies are settled on T+0.

This brings operational discipline into focus, particularly in Asia-Pacific’s zero‑tolerance environment for trade fails. Pre‑settlement activities such as funding and FX conversion must be completed much earlier—ideally in the early morning of T+1 local time. 

In parallel, adopting industry standards and implementing automated trade‑matching solutions will help establish a strong foundation, ensuring trades are matched on T+0, or what industry practitioners refer to as being “match‑fit for T+0”.

Cross-border challenge

Timezone differences add another layer of complexity for global firms operating across Asia-Pacific. To meet T+1 settlement schedules in the region, nearly half of North American and European allocations may need to be accelerated. This signals the need for firms to reassess operating models and ensure comprehensive geographic coverage through follow-the-sun teams, regional offices, and enabling technology.

Central matching platforms that streamline allocation and confirmation and create a golden source for SSIs—regardless of trade origin—are critical to maintaining operational continuity.

The path forward

The ValueExchange report also highlights broad consensus among the respondents that most Asia-Pacific markets should transition to T+1 by 2028, with investors anticipating improved fund performance and enhanced investor access. 

However, these advantages will not be realized through speed alone, but a thorough commitment to standardize, automate, and align post-trade processes and workflows, supported by harmonized rules and practices across the region. Only then can T+1 settlement truly foster regional investment and growth, ensuring Asia-Pacific remains a destination of choice for global investors.

Val Wotton is managing director and global head of equities solutions at the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here