T+1 in Asia-Pacific: Preparing post-trade operations for what’s ahead
There are benefits of Asia-Pacific markets moving to T+1, but there are unique complexities to tackle, says DTCC’s Val Wotton.
With Europe set to transition to T+1 settlement in 2027, the global shift to faster settlement is picking up pace. Shorter settlement cycles are driving the need for robust post-trade automation to enable faster post-trade processing, ensure compliance, and strengthen operational resilience in an increasingly interconnected global marketplace.
With China and India now at T+0/T+1, it is imperative that Asia-Pacific markets make the transition to T+1 to remain competitive on the global stage.
As discussions around Asia-Pacific’s T+1 transition pick up speed, ValueExchange issued a report, T+1 in Asia-Pacific: Finding a Common Ground, released in November 2025, to gauge industry readiness and facilitate informed dialogue. Drawing on insights from a survey of 244 market participants—including major global firms—the final report reveals critical perspectives and concerns that will shape ongoing conversations. These findings go beyond being informative; they are pivotal in driving meaningful action and operational preparedness across the industry.
The Asia-Pacific reality
The report reinforces findings that will be familiar to those with knowledge of the region. Asia-Pacific’s journey to T+1 is expected to involve unique complexities, as the region’s markets are defined by their diversity—spanning multiple time zones, currencies, varying levels of market maturity, deep market fragmentation, and a patchwork of regulatory frameworks. This diversity is not just a backdrop; it represents the primary barrier to a smooth T+1 transition.
Firms will need to rethink trade settlement and risk management practices, with the report showing that up to 54% of post-trade processes must speed up their operations to meet tighter deadlines in a T+1 settlement cycle.
Success will hinge on critical enablers such as automating the setup and maintenance of standard settlement instructions (SSIs), implementing pre-settlement matching of trade allocations and confirmations on trade date (T+0), straight-through processing and eliminating manual workflows—measures that collectively close operational gaps, reduce errors, reinforce operational resilience—to enable a seamless transition.
Notably, 70% of custodians are particularly concerned with trade fails, which are expected to climb by as much as 25%, pointing to limitations in legacy processes that will struggle to meet accelerated settlement timelines.
The SSI imperative
The findings further highlight that 70% of Asia’s settlement instructions will need to be automated to meet T+1 timelines. Legacy systems and manual interventions are ill-suited for the speed and accuracy required under T+1. Inaccurate or incomplete settlement instructions remain one of the leading causes of settlement failures across the industry, and the compressed timeline leaves little room for error.
The solution is to implement an automated database for storing and sharing SSIs—enabling back-office teams to operate more efficiently and reduce operational risk as critical data can flow seamlessly downstream for settlement processing.
Twin risks
When evaluating T+1 implementation, Asia-Pacific markets may also face heightened settlement risks, particularly around funding mismatches and trade fails. With settlement deadlines as early as 10 am to 1:30 pm local time in some markets under the T+2 regime, firms have approximately one and a half days to match/confirm, fund and settle trades.
These challenges are most severe in Tier 3 markets. When respondents were asked about the anticipated concerns in a T+1 environment by market profile, 83% cited currency controls and reporting requirements as placing greater strain on funding today. Notably, concern also exists in Tier 2 (69%) and Tier 1 (56%) markets, underscoring that funding constraints and time zone differences are central hurdles in the region.
This is the dilemma. These pressures may translate into higher pre‑funding costs and an increased risk of trade failures, particularly for trades involving offshore counterparties.
To navigate these challenges, firms can explore strategies such as leveraging auto‑FX solutions, adjusting funding approaches, enhancing liquidity management, or partnering with custodians to identify viable options. The ValueExchange report also points to the importance of ensuring major FX currencies are settled on T+0.
This brings operational discipline into focus, particularly in Asia-Pacific’s zero‑tolerance environment for trade fails. Pre‑settlement activities such as funding and FX conversion must be completed much earlier—ideally in the early morning of T+1 local time.
In parallel, adopting industry standards and implementing automated trade‑matching solutions will help establish a strong foundation, ensuring trades are matched on T+0, or what industry practitioners refer to as being “match‑fit for T+0”.
Cross-border challenge
Timezone differences add another layer of complexity for global firms operating across Asia-Pacific. To meet T+1 settlement schedules in the region, nearly half of North American and European allocations may need to be accelerated. This signals the need for firms to reassess operating models and ensure comprehensive geographic coverage through follow-the-sun teams, regional offices, and enabling technology.
Central matching platforms that streamline allocation and confirmation and create a golden source for SSIs—regardless of trade origin—are critical to maintaining operational continuity.
The path forward
The ValueExchange report also highlights broad consensus among the respondents that most Asia-Pacific markets should transition to T+1 by 2028, with investors anticipating improved fund performance and enhanced investor access.
However, these advantages will not be realized through speed alone, but a thorough commitment to standardize, automate, and align post-trade processes and workflows, supported by harmonized rules and practices across the region. Only then can T+1 settlement truly foster regional investment and growth, ensuring Asia-Pacific remains a destination of choice for global investors.
Val Wotton is managing director and global head of equities solutions at the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Equity data plans eye Dec. 6 for overnight trading launch
The US SIPs are looking to launch near 24-hour operations as exchanges seek to extend their hours.
Securities industry nears tipping point for dual messaging standards
Industry groups call for a freeze on ISO 15022 maintenance to accelerate ISO 20022 adoption.
Sprecher says ICE will expand positioning in crypto, prediction markets
Jeff Sprecher, CEO of ICE: “We have two new [chairmen at] the SEC and CFTC that are working to try to pull the entrepreneurship in the wild west into the financial system.”
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience.
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralized supervision if the proposed reforms go through.
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks.
Market participants voice concerns as landmark EU AI Act deadline approaches
Come August, the EU’s AI Act will start to sink its teeth into Europe. Despite the short window, financial firms are still wondering how best to comply.
ICE to seek tokenization approval from SEC under existing federal laws
CEO Jeff Sprecher says the new NYSE tokenization initiative is not dependent on the passage of the US Clarity Act.