Singapore, Hong Kong Algo Performance Lags Japan
Singapore and Hong Kong lag Japan when it comes to algorithm performance across markets, according to a recent study released by trading technology provider Tora Trading.
Through the first six months of 2010, Tora officials examined 120,000 algo orders from their client base and found that in a best-case performance comparison against the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) benchmark, slippage, the difference between the expected price of a trade and the price where the trade is actually executed, was 111 percent higher for Hong Kong than Japan and 236 percent higher in Singapore than Japan.
This is likely due to liquidity concentration as well as differences in market structure for markets outside Japan, say Tora officials.
The study found that the average slippage in Singapore was 15.1 basis points (bps) and 9.5 bps in Hong Kong. In Japan, it was 4.5 bps for Tora clients.
"Our analysis looked at a wide range of factors that affect performance, including liquidity, volatility, spreads and user-defined parameters," said Tora CEO Robert Dykes in a prepared statement. "The key to maximizing algorithm performance is to use the one that best reacts to prevailing market conditions."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Google, CME say they’ve proved cloud can support HFT—now what?
After demonstrating in September that ultra-low-latency trading can be facilitated in the cloud, the exchange and tech giant are hoping to see barriers to entry come down, particularly as overnight trading looms.
Institutional priorities in multi-asset investing
Private markets, broader exposures and the race for integration
BlackRock and AccessFintech partner, LSEG collabs with OpenAI, Apex launches Pisces service, and more
The Waters Cooler: CJC launches MDC service, Centreon secures Sixth Street investment, UK bond CT update, and more in this week’s news roundup.
TCB Data-Broadhead pairing highlights challenges of market data management
Waters Wrap: The vendors are hoping that blending TCB’s reporting infrastructure with Broadhead’s DLT-backed digital contract and auditing engine will be the cure for data rights management.
Robeco tests credit tool built in Bloomberg’s Python platform
This follows the asset manager’s participation in Bloomberg’s Code Crunch hackathon in Singapore, alongside other firms including LGT Investment Bank and university students.
FCA eyes equities tape, OpenAI and Capco team up, prediction markets gain steam, and more
The Waters Cooler: More tokenization, Ediphy lawsuit updates, Rimes teams up with Databricks, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Buy-side data heads push being on ‘right side’ of GenAI
Data heads at Man Group and Systematica Investments explain how GenAI has transformed the quant research process.
Technology alone is not enough for Europe’s T+1 push
Testing will be a key component of a successful implementation. However, the respective taskforces have yet to release more details on the testing schedules.