February 2011: Time to Get with the Program

There are two types of technology vendors currently operating in the financial services industry: those that have come to the realization that their primary raison d’etre is service and not technology. And there are those that have not.
This argument might sound a bit counterintuitive, but upon closer scrutiny, its logic is difficult to unpick. And here’s why: Technology in the financial services industry has, by and large, become commoditized, to the extent that it no longer guarantees vendors a competitive advantage. Sure, it’s required to enter the game, but it won’t, by itself, win you customers.
Closely coupled with this notion is the growing realization that end-users’ consumer habits have changed over the last decade. Firms are now driven by factors other than purely functional ones when it comes to arriving at their purchasing decisions. Clearly, price is one factor, but it’s not the most important—not by a long shot. The single most important factor driving “buy” decisions is the level of service offered by the vendor. But, it seems, not everyone gets this.
When you factor in the incestuous nature of the various constituents that collectively constitute the financial services industry, only then do you get an inkling of how influential the information is that is passed between market participants, based primarily on the levels of service they have experienced through their vendor relationships.
In short, people talk, and, as a technology vendor, you do not want them talking about your poor levels of service, regardless of how good your underlying technology might be. Conversely, if you’re able to develop a reputation for delivering on your promises—especially when it comes to implementations—being amenable, approachable and generally easy to live with, you can probably lay off your entire marketing department secure in the knowledge that your happy clients will do a more-than-acceptable job of managing your marketing functions for you.
And yet there are still an appreciable number of Luddite-esque technology vendors that assume their products alone will guarantee their future. It did in the past, right? Yes, that may be, but the 2011 operating environment is so far removed from that of four years ago, that comparisons between the two are pointless. Most technology vendors acknowledge this fact, but for those that haven’t, maybe they will finally board the service train this year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Deutsche Bank casts a cautious eye towards agentic AI
“An AI worker is something that is really buildable,” says innovation and AI head
LLMs are making alternative datasets ‘fuzzy’
Waters Wrap: While large language models and generative/agentic AI offer an endless amount of opportunity, they are also exposing unforeseen risks and challenges.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
Agentic AI takes center stage, bank tech projects, new funding rounds and more
The Waters Cooler: SEC hack investigation, FCA–Nvidia partnership, LTX BondGPT upgrade, and CDO problems are also in this week’s news round-up.
CDOs must deliver short-term wins ‘that people give a crap about’
The IMD Wrap: Why bother having a CDO when so many firms replace them so often? Some say CDOs should stop focusing on perfection, and focus instead on immediate deliverables that demonstrate value to the broader business.
Perceive, reason, act: Agentic AI, graph tech used to assess risk
Industry executive Jay Krish is experimenting with large language models to help PMs monitor for risk.
NY Fed Home Loans Bank spurns multi-cloud model
The cost and complexity of diversifying away from the big three providers outweighs concentration risks.
Citi close to launching GenAI investment tools
The new tech will be used to improve investment recommendations and increase cross-selling opportunities.