OMSs Must Overcome Database Bottlenecks

Gavin, Little-Gill, Linedata Services

Order management system (OMS) vendors face a dilemma: They can open their platforms to third-party risk management tools and deal with the performance degradation due to accessing databases, or they can opt not to open their systems and potentially lose clients to vendors that do.

"The challenges firms have with adopting separate OMSs and execution management systems (EMSs) is that separate databases really slow down applications," says Gavin Little-Gill, global head of asset management strategy

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income

Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here