Corporate Actions special report

Click here to download the PDF
A Standard Route
When I first took up the position as editor of Inside Reference Data four years ago, I was very excited about researching a report on why it was a good idea to standardize corporate actions information at the source-level. At that point, I thought I had shed light on something new. But I soon realized this was a topic that had already been on the agenda for years.
And it still is. Standardization at the issuer-level remains the missing piece. To reap the full benefits of investments in automating the corporate actions lifecycle, the industry will have to continue to raise awareness of the need for issuer involvement.
In recent years, data tagging standard XBRL has emerged as a potential solution, as it is now widely used for financial reporting. The question is if the industry can collaborate and, perhaps with support from regulators, convince the issuer community that standardization is the way forward.
In this Corporate Actions special report, which includes comments from industry experts and a news review, we hope to keep readers informed about the importance of what is happening in today's market, and how these developments can make a difference to the corporate actions processing cycle.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
24/7 trading roll-out risks pushback, industry veterans say
DRW’s Wilson warns of “mutiny” on non-stop rate options trading.
Ediphy challenges FCA, Sterling launches new OMS, and more
The UK bond tape is halted, LSEG and Databricks partner, Wells Fargo adopts TransFICC’s One API, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Man Group sees alpha-generating strategies from agentic AI
The firm is seeing actionable use cases from AI agents, said CTO Gary Collier, speaking at a conference in London hosted by Bloomberg.
Expero sharpens focus on financial clients
After 20 years of delivering software, AI tools and digital UXs across industries, Expero is leaving its jack-of-all-trades strategy, aiming to become a master of one.
The TNS–Radianz deal hints at underlying issues in trader voice
Waters Wrap: As part of its cost-cutting program, BT shipped its Radianz unit to TNS, but the deal didn’t include its Trading & Command trader voice property. Anthony finds that interesting.
OEMS interest sputters
Combined order and execution management systems once offered great promise, but large buy-side firms increasingly want specialization, leaving OEMS vendors to chase smaller asset managers in a world of EMS consolidation.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
DORA delay leaves EU banks fighting for their audit rights
The regulation requires firms to expand scrutiny of critical vendors that haven’t yet been identified.