Lies, Damn Lies, and Surveys

Sometimes they make me want to laugh; sometimes they make me want to launch into a profanity-laced tirade—the bottom line is that surveys and poll results are a necessary evil, but are often of limited value and shouldn’t be taken too seriously. This is only exacerbated during an election year. Every time President Barack Obama delivers a speech, the talking heads gleefully serve up the latest poll numbers. If Mitt Romney makes a gaffe, the news networks examine how much ground he's lost.
If you believe the news networks, Americans change their minds on a weekly basis about which candidate they're going to vote for come November. Yet in my experience, only a handful of people hadn’t already made up their minds before election season even began.
In financial technology, surveys and polls abound. Indeed, we at WatersTechnology produce them on a regular basis. They provide an interesting snapshot of what people are thinking, but always take the results with a grain of salt—and not just because the results aren’t scientific.
Often, survey and polltakers bear out the principle that “you don’t know what you know,” and don’t answer the questions accurately. A good example of this came in May when Waters conducted a webcast looking at cloud adoption on the buy side.
During the online event, 35 percent of respondents said they don’t use cloud at all. Really? Not for email? Not for data storage? No deployments of software-as-a-services (SaaS)? Nada?
I just don’t buy it—and I believe most respondents don’t understand exactly what cloud encompasses. If they don’t employ Amazon or Google, they assume their firms are cloud-free.
Survey and poll inaccuracies are not only the fault of the respondents. I receive surveys that are either conducted by, or sponsored by, vendors and trade associations. In these cases, people might answer questions based on what they think the pollster wants to hear, or because they have an agenda to advance.
So if surveys and polls are flawed in some way or another, they must be useless, right? Wrong.
What they do is allow firms and vendors to look out for knowledge gaps, misunderstandings—as in the cloud question—or general areas that need attention. They are not the be-all, end-all—they’re guides.
I never allow someone to win an argument by citing a survey. But if the numbers are out of whack, there's a reason to take a deeper look. The numbers are useless; the topics can be fruitful.
Let's take an informal poll: Who thinks surveys are useless? Email "yay" or "nay" to me at anthony.malakian@incisivemedia.com or give me a call at 646-490-3973.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
The Model Context Protocol brings agents to life—along with risk
Waters Wrap: From chat to infrastructure modernization, Anthropic’s MCP offers a ‘bridge’ to agentic AI, but its early days may prove disillusioning.
NZX outlines plans to bolster fast-growing dark pool
Since launching one year ago, NZX’s dark book has 5.5% of the exchange’s total turnover, and price improvement per trade on average is 11 basis points, but the exchange has more in store.
Agentic AI comes to Bloomberg Terminal via Anthropic protocol
The data giant’s ubiquitous terminal has been slowly opening up for years, but its latest enhancement represents a forward leap in what CTO Shawn Edwards calls, “the way we should talk to the world.”
M&G Investments braves cost headwinds in pursuit of AI
The UK asset manager’s AI ambitions started with the creation of a data lake to ensure high-quality data is being fed into models.
Asic probe piles pressure on ASX to deliver Chess replacement
But market insiders think late intervention by regulators could even slow down implementation.
Stakes raised for UK bond, EU derivatives tapes after Ediphy clinches win
The pressure is on for TransFICC, Etrading, Finbourne, and Propellant Digital, who are still vying to provide the UK’s fixed income consolidated tape after Esma awarded the EU’s tape to Ediphy and its partners.
Exchange M&A, US moratorium on AI regs dashed, Citi’s “fat-finger”-killer, and more
The Waters Cooler: Euronext-Athex, SIX-Aquis, Blue Ocean-Eventus, EDM Association, and more in this week’s news roundup.
LSEG officially sunsets Eikon
The exchange operator withdrew the platform from its product lineup this week.