Algorithmic Trading special report
Click here to download the PDF
Praising Parameterization
The extent to which algorithmic trading has permeated the financial services industry depends on who you ask. Take, for example, a traditional, equities-only "pick-and-stick" asset manager, which typically employs lengthy investment horizons, and therefore, may only execute a small number of orders during the course of a normal month. Shredding large block trades into smaller child orders as a way of increasing the likelihood of obtaining a fill and reducing market impact and diversifying risk, is not something long-only shops are interested in. But scratch under the surface of a more "adventurous" buy-side entity-any firm that executes large numbers of trades during the course of a typical trading day-and you'll find a small army of home grown, broker-provided, or third-party-developed algorithms hard at work, responsible for determining when to trade, where to trade, how to trade, and how often to trade. This might sound highly sophisticated, but in truth, the market's forerunners have been doing this sort of thing for at least the past decade.
What has changed in recent years, however, is the extent to which providers-both brokers and specialist third-party vendors-have "parameterized" their offerings, allowing users to tweak their parameters on-the-fly, effectively changing the algorithm's behaviour without affecting its core logic. This means that in the event that traders believe market conditions have changed from what they were when the algorithm was initially deployed-which can undermine the algo's efficacy-they can modify any number of parameters, thereby maintaining its level of specificity and effectiveness. In the past, end-users were most often forced to rely on their algo developers to make the necessary tweaks, a process that was both long-winded and laborious. In the algorithmic trading roundtable on page 4, there is frequent reference by our four panelists to the importance of parameterization, and the extent to which it allows buy-side and sell-side practitioners to differentiate themselves in what has become a crowded and highly competitive space.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
CME’s Duffy addresses outages as exchanges push toward 24/7 trading
As senior exchange execs fielded questions about overnight trading in equities, the theme of resiliency lingered.
Bloomberg enhances feeds, Standard Chartered and TP Icap partner on digital assets, and more
The Waters Cooler: LSEG and ASX partner to modernize derivatives platform, MSCI acquires two companies, State Street bolsters data business, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Apac buy-side firms embrace AI, automation to optimize business processes
Survey of Apac buy-side firms shows growing AI, API and automation usage to enhance investment workflows and enable data integration
What does the future of trader voice look like?
The trader voice market has shrunk to three main players: IPC, BT, and Symphony. The battle for market share and desk real estate is pitting hardware against software.
Bloomberg Terminal’s agentic play shows rapid change in trading tech
Waters Wrap: The data giant’s conversational AI interface might seem novel, but others say having one is becoming a bare minimum in the world of trading technology.
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralized supervision if the proposed reforms go through.
AllianceBernstein enlists SimCorp, BMLL and Features Analytics team up, and more
The Waters Cooler: Mondrian chooses FundGuard to tool up, prediction markets entice options traders, and Synechron and Cognition announce an AI engineering agreement in this week’s news roundup.
Ram AI’s quest to build an agentic multi-strat
The Swiss fund already runs an artificial intelligence model factory and a team of agentic credit analysts.