January 2014: Do Algorithms Dream of Super-Fast Sheep?

Apologies to those readers who scoff at my somewhat obvious play on the title of Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, published in 1968 and which served as the premise for one of the finest science-fiction movies ever made: Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner. I’m not especially a fan of sci-fi movies as a genre, but few works come as close to cinematic perfection as does Blade Runner, which broods from one low-lit, rainy scene to another, set against Vangelis’ sublime soundtrack, and culminating in Rutger Hauer’s partially ad-libbed and now iconic “Tears in the Rain” monologue. Yes, I’m a big fan.
But there’s more to my rhetorical question than simply conveying my appreciation of Blade Runner. Since their introduction to the capital markets more than a decade ago, algorithms have been evolving in terms of their sophistication, from basic computer programs designed to fire buy and sell orders into the marketplace when the optimum conditions occur, to entities that possess a certain artificial intelligence that allows them to undertake far more than merely financial firms’ donkey work.
Now, algorithms have the ability to “learn” from past “experience,” intentionally routing orders to specific destinations to obtain the most advantageous and likely fills. While this behavior is far from anything approaching a consciousness and the ability to genuinely make their own decisions based on something other than programmed inputs, surely that time will come sooner or later.
In the meantime, the capital markets remain awash with hundreds of thousands of algorithms watching and waiting for their opportunities to strike. While that characterization might sound a little sinister—and to those commentators who point the finger of blame at rogue algorithms responsible for fiascos such as the Flash Crash, I’m sure it does—it’s important to remember that as intelligent as they are, they are really only the coded manifestations of quants’ calculations, designed to carry out their work in a logical and consistent manner. The fact that algorithms’ behavior is closely tied to many of the most serious technology glitches to have occurred in the last five years is irrefutable. But if they could defend themselves, they’d be quick to argue that even the rogues among them are doing only what their human masters have commanded, and no more.
And so, while we might still be some way off from witnessing the introduction of genuinely intelligent algorithms that possess an artificial consciousness, it doesn’t hurt to speculate about what they might end up dreaming about in the early hours when their minders have left the office.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Waters Wavelength Ep. 331: Cresting Wave’s Bill Murphy
Bill Murphy, Blackstone’s former CTO, joins to discuss that much-discussed MIT study on AI projects failing and factors executives should consider as the technology continues to evolves.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
Chief investment officers persist with GenAI tools despite ‘blind spots’
Trading heads from JP Morgan, UBS, and M&G Investments explained why their firms were bullish on GenAI, even as “replicability and reproducibility” challenges persist.
Wall Street hesitates on synthetic data as AI push gathers steam
Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan have differing opinions on the use of synthetic data to train LLMs.
A Q&A with H2O’s tech chief on reducing GenAI noise
Timothée Consigny says the key to GenAI experimentation rests in leveraging the expertise of portfolio managers “to curate smaller and more relevant datasets.”
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
AI fails for many reasons but succeeds for few
Firms hoping to achieve ROI on their AI efforts must focus on data, partnerships, and scale—but a fundamental roadblock remains.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 330: AI hot takes
It’s Shen and Reb this week talking about AI and the landscape for fintech partnerships.