Anthony Malakian: Now the Fun Begins ... Well, Not Really
September and the changing of the leaves means a return to the task at hand—prepping for a complete regulatory overhaul and what that means to your firm’s IT. Yet, for all the bluster I’m hearing—about how we’re going to get inundated with the final rules with reference to how the Dodd–Frank Act will be implemented—I think this is really much ado about nothing.
This isn’t to say that major rules aren’t coming or that the already-finalized rules aren’t significant in their own right; instead, what I believe is that the really juicy stuff that pertains to final rules on swap execution facilities (SEFs) and clearing will likely be undecided until, at best, next year.
Finalized
But let’s first take a look at what has been finalized. According to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), there are a whopping seven rules that the industry will have to become compliant with this month (September). Of those rules, however, only one has a major immediate impact on buy-side firms.
The big one, from a technology perspective, is the one that creates more strict reporting rules for large traders. For the first time, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will be able to “survey systematically the cleared and uncleared swaps markets.” This rule is designed to help regulators investigate more quickly and efficiently instances of market manipulation in order to help avoid market shocks, such as the one seen with last May’s Flash Crash.
This rule was brought about as a result of the increase in high-frequency trading and the fragmentation it has created, according to the SEC’s chairman Mary Schapiro. The new legislation is expected to impact more than 400 large traders, defined by the SEC as “a person whose transactions in NMS securities equals or exceeds two million shares or $20 million during any calendar day, or 20 million shares or $200 million during any calendar month.”
Large traders will be assigned an identification number “that will uniquely and uniformly identify the trader, which the large trader must then provide to its registered broker-dealers.” Those broker-dealers will have to maintain records of the time transactions were executed and provide transaction information to the SEC and CFTC upon request. Finally, and perhaps most controversially, “certain registered broker-dealers subject to the Rule will be required to perform limited monitoring of their customers’ accounts for activities that may trigger the large trader identification requirements” of the rule.
It’s still unclear just how much of an effect this rule is going to have on the buy-side community, but it’s likely to cause quite a bit of pain from a business strategy standpoint and could result in some unforeseeable technological challenges. However, the real earth-moving changes, with the trading and clearing of swaps being the tip of the iceberg, are not likely to be finalized this year—there might be some clarity around bits and pieces, but nothing substantial.
Spanner in the Works
In addition to what the CFTC and SEC are hashing out—they’ve previously stated that they may differ on some enforcement rules, which might just throw a spanner in the works—other industry organizations are working to establish new rules to top those introduced by the CFTC and the SEC. For example, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and the Futures Industry Association (FIA) are jointly publishing rules for non-SEF traded and cleared swaps, which include a controversial “give-up agreement.” These rules will not be mandatory, but they have caused a bit of consternation among buy-side firms.
I keep hearing about how the last four months of 2011 will be dominated by the implementation of Dodd–Frank and what technological challenges will be created as a result. But the way I see it, the last four months are likely to look pretty much like the first eight months of the year—no clarity, just confusion.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
European firms prime for lopsided settlement in North America and at home
With T+1 imminent in North America and increasingly likely to traverse the Atlantic, operations and trading professionals in Europe are fighting on two fronts.
As crypto ETFs become reality, benchmark providers take center stage
The SEC’s approval of the first spot bitcoin ETFs will expose a growing number of traditional market participants to the maturing world of crypto data, a moment that some—such as CF Benchmarks, BlackRock’s benchmark provider—have been eagerly awaiting.
Most read
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won
- Witad Awards 2024: Above and beyond award (vendor)—Susan Bennett, Tradeweb
- Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest