Michael Shashoua: Confounding Interests
The developments in the saga of the legal entity identifier (LEI) continue to yield surprises. I wrote in March that coordinating the LEI with other identifiers could make it more effective and give it a smoother path to implementation. The latest changes in LEI governance and data management make it clear that path will remain rocky because differences between national LEI standards persist.
The significance of the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC), administrator of the global LEI standard, setting out new principles in late July for pre-local operating units (LOUs), cannot be overstated. The rules forced the US pre-LOU, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, with its CFTC Interim Compliant Identifier (CICI), to scrap 20 percent of its pre-LEI registrations, removing them from the utility administered by Swift and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC).
So, the LEI continues to meet global resistance—in this case from the global regulatory body disallowing registrations that were not made by the entity itself or with the entity’s permission. The rationale for instituting the LEI was to be able to track securities and their ownership, so only being able to do so with the permission of the company whose shares are at issue, defeats the functionality of the identifier.
The Special Relationship
The UK and the US—perhaps with a “special relationship” when it comes to the LEI—are responding with the same tack to the international resistance. The London Stock Exchange, which is issuing the UK’s pre-LEI, the Interim Entity Identifier (IEI), says the IEI will comply with ROC guidelines and will allow for portability of pre-LEI records between LOUs (or pre-LOUs).
The US Treasury’s Office of Financial Research (OFR) has proposed an interim system that would make pre-LEIs from any LOU compatible for reporting worldwide. Since these allied nations couldn’t beat the others into accepting their identifier standard, they now propose to join them in devising the standard and implementing it the way the rest of the world wants.
In June 2012, the FSB and the CFTC were batting responsibility for the LEI standard back and forth, like kids in a sandbox.
States and Confusion
This state of affairs leaves it to outside registries to coordinate and consolidate the growing number of types of pre-LEIs—from the US, Germany, France and most recently the UK, with more countries expected to follow. A consortium of independent organizations including GS1, the Corporation for National Research Initiatives, FIX Protocol and consultancy Tahoe Blue, is running P-lei.org, an LEI distribution project that aims to put all the pre-LEIs into a consistent format. It’s curious, to say the least, that this consortium is the body now doing the real work of keeping LEIs organized and consistent, rather than the ROC or its Central Operating Unit. Matters will become more complex as more countries come up with their own pre-LEIs, a scenario that appears increasingly likely.
Looking back over the past two years of the LEI implementation process doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in the discrepancies being sorted out. Last December, the Financial Stability Board (FSB), which later created ROC to handle the LEI, started to recognize concerns about LOUs duplicating LEIs, and creating inconsistencies. But two-thirds of 2013 have now passed, and the same challenge still exists.
In June 2012, the FSB and the US CFTC were batting responsibility for the LEI standard back and forth, like kids in a sandbox. The CFTC launched its CICI identifier with statements that something had to be done because the FSB hadn’t completed a workable standard. The ROC has struck back, forcing the CFTC into a “do-over.”
Considering all this, it appears that the serious business of getting a workable and consistent identifier to track securities and financial transactions is being managed more like a playground battle, and suffering from political turf wars. Perhaps it’s time to call a “time out” so that everyone can think it over?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bank-led consortium takes aim at position reporting
Five banks, including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and HSBC, have joined forces to mitigate interpretation and implementation errors in position reporting disclosures.
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- DTCC urges affirmation focus ahead of T+1 move
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won