UBS Stung with Record Fine for Libor Manipulation
The FSA's indictment, distributed earlier this morning, accuses UBS of systematically manipulating the benchmark rates over a period of five years and colluding with other market participants in order to do so, benefiting its own trading results. The regulator said that it found 2,000 cases of documented requests for rate fixing, and also revealed that an "unquantifiable" number of oral requests were also made.
Libor and Euribor are benchmark rates that essentially determine how banks lend to one another, and are calculated by Thomson Reuters on a daily basis, overseen by the British Bankers' Association in London, after submission from panel institutions. As well as setting loan conditions between banks, many retail financial products, such as mortgages and loans, derive their interest rate from a fixed amount plus Libor.
Given the widespread nature of the case, the FSA said that every submission made for Libor and Euribor by UBS during this period is suspect. Although UBS split its trading and submitting roles in 2009, its systems and compliance function were unable to detect requests for manipulation, which used codewords. The FSA said that up to 45 individuals, including traders and senior managers, had direct knowledge of the activity.
A damning section of the release also stated that, in order to encourage interdealer brokers to help affect other panel banks' submissions for Japanese Yen (JPY), corrupt brokerage payments were made through so-called wash trades. These trades are essentially risk-free and contain little commercial benefit, serving instead to transfer money through brokerage commission payments.
Although UBS did not qualify for the full 30 percent discount for settlement, it did gain a 20 percent mark down, which otherwise would have raised the fine to £200 million (approximately $388 million). It is the largest financial penalty ever levied by the UK regulator, which is being split into two component parts in 2013.
Although UBS did not qualify for the full 30 percent discount for settlement, it did gain a 20 percent mark down, which otherwise would have raised the fine to £200 million
"The findings we have set out in our notice today do not make for pretty reading," says Tracy McDermott, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA. "The integrity of benchmarks such as Libor and Euribor are of fundamental importance to both UK and international financial markets. UBS traders and managers ignored this. They manipulated UBS's submissions in order to benefit their own positions and to protect UBS's reputation, showing a total disregard for the millions of market participants around the world who were also affected by Libor and Euribor. UBS's misconduct was all the more serious because of the orchestrated attempts to manipulate the JPY Libor submissions of other banks, as well as its own, and the collusion with interdealer brokers and other panel banks in coordinated efforts to manipulate the fix.
"Over an extended period UBS allowed this to happen through its failure to control its business appropriately to ensure that Libor and Euribor submissions properly reflected the relevant requirements. There should be no doubt about how seriously the FSA views these failings. This is our largest penalty to date and demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that those in the wholesale markets do not put their own interests above those of the markets as a whole," McDermott continued
The FSA settlement was part of a wider fine regime with other regulators, which has so far totalled around £940 million (approximately $1.8 billion) in fines for UBS. This figure comes despite immunity from some regulators for cooperation in the early stages of the investigation. More banks are expected to be fined over Libor and Euribor in the coming days.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Where have four years of Cusip legal drama gone?
The IMD Wrap: The antitrust case against Cusip Global Services has been a long, winding road. Reb recaps what you might have missed.
LSEG files second motion to dismiss lawsuit with MayStreet co-founder
Exchange group has denied abandoning the MayStreet business in a new filing, responding to allegations put forward by former MayStreet CEO Patrick Flannery.
‘The end of the beginning’: Brown Brothers Harriman re-invents itself
Voice of the CDO: Firms who want to use AI successfully better start with their metadata, says BBH’s Mike McGovern and Kevin Welch.
Editor’s Picks: Our best from 2025
Anthony Malakian picks out 10 stories from the past 12 months that set the stage for the new year.
Market data costs defy cyclicality
Trading firms continue to grapple with escalating market data costs. Can innovative solutions and strategic approaches bring relief?
LSEG partners with Citi, DTCC goes on-chain, AI on the brain, and more
The Waters Cooler: Trading Technologies buys OpenGamma, CT Plan updates, and the beginning of benchmarking in this week’s news roundup.
AI & data enablement: A looming reality or pipe dream?
Waters Wrap: The promise of AI and agents is massive, and real-world success stories are trickling out. But Anthony notes that firms still need to be hyper-focused on getting the data foundation correct before adding layers.
Data managers worry lack of funding, staffing will hinder AI ambitions
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to WatersTechnology’s data benchmark survey rated the pressure they’re receiving from senior executives and the board as very high. But is the money flowing for talent and data management?