For IBOR, Pick a Definition and Stick To It

Sometimes you get lucky. On Monday, Mother Nature dumped down snow on New York and then did so again on Wednesday, with a third closing performance still scheduled for this Sunday. But on Tuesday the sky was clear, even if the sidewalks were slick.
That morning, Waters hosted an IBOR Breakfast Briefing in Midtown Manhattan, gathering end-users and vendors from around the industry to debate the latest advancements for building these systems.
What I found to be most interesting from the two panels and two presentations was that the definition of what entails an investment book of record, how it should be run and who should have control, all appear to be a moving target. Certainly, it would seem that the vendors pitching their wares have adjusted their strategy of late.
In the past, vendors seemed to present IBOR as a front-, middle- and back-office, all-encompassing data management solution. Some still do. Others may still believe that to be the case, but now they are targeting their pitches a bit more with IBOR constituting a front-office system that, first and foremost, is there to make a portfolio manager's life easier.
This played well for Jay Vyas, head of quantitative investing at the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), which manages about $173 billion. During his keynote address he made it very clear that an IBOR should be a tool to support traders and PMs, and it's not a reporting or compliance platform. The end thesis was that an IBOR is not an accounting book of record (ABOR) and should be kept completely separate from an ABOR, apart from being reconciled at end-of-day.
Barry Chester, who founded the consultancy Barry Chester & Company, said that before any firm embarks on an IBOR implementation ─ which are long, arduous and complex ─ the business leaders must first decide on how exactly they will define their IBOR.
This is an important note that may seem obvious, but is born of experience. If the back office is expecting one set of functionality and the portfolio managers are expecting something completely different, you're going to be left with a system that is tangled, inefficient and, ultimately, costly.
Vyas noted during a panel discussion that within CPPIB, his group runs its own IBOR, but that IBOR is not shared with other groups. Those groups are left to build their own. Meanwhile, BMO Asset Management's Todd Healy said that their IBOR, which took three years to build, is run across the organization. At CPPIB, PMs handle all data input; at BMO, the PMs have ceded that control.
This is all to say that there simply isn't a standardized, industry-driven definition for IBOR. So basically it's up to the firm itself to create its own clear and prescriptive definition, and stick to it.
Click here to find all of our IBOR coverage.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Waters Wavelength Ep. 327: Standard Chartered’s Mo Rahim
He joins the podcast to discuss data and AI governance and guardrails for AI.
Messaging’s chameleon: The changing faces and use cases of ISO 20022
The standard is being enhanced beyond its core payments messaging function to be adopted for new business needs.
S&P Global details AI partnerships, LLM advancements
The data provider has partnered with Microsoft and Anthropic to use hyperscaler tech to boost its AI offerings.
The industry is not ready for what’s around the corner
Waters Wrap: As cloud usage and AI capabilities continue to evolve (and costs go up), Anthony believes the fintech industry may face a similar predicament to the one facing journalism today.
Overbond’s demise hints at cloud-cost complexities
The fixed-income analytics platform provider shuttered after failing to find new funding or a merger partner as costs for its serverless cloud infrastructure “ballooned.”
ViaNexus aims to bring data entitlement control to MCP, agentic AI
The startup believes that Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol marks a major step forward for agentic AI, but the market data industry has its own complexities that haven’t been addressed—yet.
IEX automates reporting and billing with DataBP
The exchange has enlisted DataBP to help put structure around its reporting and billing—and potentially how clients subscribe to its data.
Buy-side transformation requires data stabilization
The IMD Wrap: Insightful and actionable data tools require reliable and accurate underlying data. Max looks at some startling findings from recent reports that highlight the key data challenges that lie ahead.