More banks flirt with machine learning for CCAR—but risks persist

The superior computational grunt of neural networks is attractive to lenders, but a lack of explainability presents a significant downside.

Machine learning techniques are taking hold in US banks’ stress-testing models, bit by bit and byte by byte. Proponents trumpet their ability to calculate revenue and loan-loss forecasts faster than existing methods. But users are running up against a familiar barrier: the difficulty of explaining the complex practices to model validators and regulators.

One large US bank is developing a prototype model for its annual Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) as well as for the Current

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: