The good, the bad, and the ugly of financial democratization

From crypto and Web3 to Robinhood and Reddit, democratization underscores it all. While it’s a largely benign concept that aims to level the playing field between institutions and individuals, it’s also really hard to get right.

Over the past year or so, some of my reporting has kept me coming back to two key themes—money and technology. On its face, that makes sense; this is WatersTechnology, a publication that covers data and technology as they relate to the capital markets. The way this outlet cares about money and technology is through the lens of helping end-users do their jobs better—showcasing innovative ways to trade, make deals, speed up slog and, hopefully, hold some vendors and institutions to account along

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

How GenAI could improve T+1 settlement

As well as reducing settlement failures, IBM researchers believe generative AI can provide investment managers with improved research, prioritization, and allocation resources.

Interoperability is not AI

Dan Schleifer, co-founder of, explains how desktop interoperability underpins new AI developments.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here