Major Adjustments on the MiFIR Front
Chris Pickles of the FIX Trading Community shares his thoughts on the effects of MiFID II postponement and the reasons why it happened

What will the ramifications of MiFID II's postponement be for MiFIR?
There are still questions about details that firms are just realizing they need to ask regulators. Firms simply hadn't realized the impact of moves such as the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) publication of reference data free of charge. Firms need to work out the interrelationships of MiFID II and MiFIR with the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive and Solvency II, as well as the UK's Market Abuse Regulation. The postponement gives all financial services segments time to work out what it means for their business models and to make changes. Thanks to ESMA, investment firms whose use of reference data is limited by licenses will be able to get that data license-free. All the contracts that control the use, re-use and redistribution of reference data throughout the data supply chain will need to change.
Was the postponement of MiFID II compliance by a year to early 2018 justified?
The postponement was very much justified due to the need for greater clarity on issues that MiFID II addresses. Some of the directions proposed under MiFIR and the draft technical specifications involve significant change for thousands of investment firms internationally. Take the proposed requirement to use ISINs to identify exchange-traded derivatives, when ESMA had previously made it clear that it recognized that ISINs were rarely used for derivatives. Changing central data management systems for universal banks that operate internationally is no minor task. So many other investment firm systems depend on those central data management systems.
What was the true cause of the postponement?
One of the key elements of content and timing that led to the postponement was the release of the final version of ESMA's proposed technical specifications, its recommendations to the European Commission, which decides whether to agree or dispute some or all of the specifications. If market participants think changes are still necessary, they must express that to the commission and the European Parliament, rather than to ESMA. Market participants did so, and as a result, the parliament considered the readiness of ESMA's report processing systems for implementing MiFID II, along with issues about reference data and instrument identification. It's better to allow more time so market participants and regulators get it right.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
AI proves helpful for banks facing new cash penalties for settlement failures
According to one report, banks have been hit with penalties of up to €5 million per month under new CSDR settlement rules. As a result, banks are turning to AI to help.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: SteelEye’s Matt Smith on eComms surveillance
SteelEye CEO Matt Smith talks on the podcast about the regulatory landscape for electronic and voice communications compliance.
Waters Wrap: For data managers, the new problems are the same as the old
While much attention has been given to cloud, AI, blockchain and other buzzwords, without a proper data foundation, those tools will not deliver the results that have been promised.
Industry participants: ‘Digital Token Identifier’ aims to increase interop, usage
While some trading firms are welcoming the use of a new non-proprietary code for identifying digital tokens, the onus will be on local regulators to enforce its adoption.
Financial firms rethink after cyber insurance premium spike
Brokers say there are signs pressure is easing, but quantum hacking threat could transform market
The year identifiers wanted some attention too
Cusip! Figi! Isin! BTC! LEI! Taylor Swift? How did we get here and where do we go now?
Consolidated tapes gain ground in 2022
Regulators in the US, UK, and EU moved to push forward market data efforts this year.
Lessons from credit: Could all-to-all help Treasury markets?
Regulators are looking to all-to-all trading as a possible solution for worrying volatility and deteriorating liquidity in US Treasury markets.