Golden Copy: Thoughts About MiFID II Postponement
Will the one-year extension to the start of 2018 be enough to solve the issues that caused the delay?
Have excuses won out?
As talk began last year that the European Commission was likely to postpone its deadline for compliance with MiFID II from January 2017 to January 2018, I weighed the reasons and justification for this postponement in these Waters and Golden Copy columns.
Maybe the more appropriate question is whose excuses—the industry's or regulators'?
Although some in the industry were saying they needed to re-evaluate budgets and figure out technology solutions to manage data for several compliance efforts, others in trading operations said they were prepared.
Reporting on the European Commission's decision, our sister site Buy-Side Technology noted that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) would not have been ready to collect data for 15 million financial instruments, from 300 venues, by 2017.
So, on balance, although the industry as a whole may not have been completely ready, the regulatory authority that has to administer MiFID II was not ready at all, and the regulation couldn't realistically go forward without its data collection capability in place.
To say that the only reason for the extension of the deadline was successful industry lobbying seems shortsighted now. Often that is the case when regulation affecting financial services industry operations gets delayed or eased. Also, regulators often are accused, rightly or wrongly, of failing to define specifics for regulation or directives. Yet, that was not the issue with MiFID II. The problem was sheer inability or lack of resources to implement compliance.
This raises a new question—will ESMA be able to muster the resources and capability given an extra year to do so?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Preparing for the gathering storm
The Markets in Crypto-Assets (Mica) regulation came into force across the European Union on June 29 to enhance the transparency and integrity of the industry’s burgeoning crypto markets. Travis Schwab, CEO of Eventus, discusses his firm’s Mica strategy…
American Bankers Assoc. asks SEC: Do you know what you’re doing?
The industry group disagrees severely with regulators’ interpretation of the Financial Data Transparency Act, hinting at possible legal action in a recently published comment letter.
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.