AnaCredit is the Future
But the European Central Bank may have a difficult time convincing market participants
While the finer points of AnaCredit, the next credit risk reporting regulation from the European Central Bank (ECB), aren't yet certain, what is certain is that granular credit risk data reporting is here to stay.
AnaCredit represents the future of statistical data collection, from siloed datasets to highly granular, flexible, multi-purpose data available to supervisors and policymakers across the eurozone. So while it is a large project in its own right, AnaCredit is just one step towards a continent-wide reporting framework that is yet a twinkle in the eye of the central banks.
The draft regulation, due at this stage to be submitted by the ECB for approval in October, has been delayed a few times—delays welcome to market participants, who feel that that the project has just gotten more and more complicated. The number of attributes to be reported around loans, for example, began at 40 or 50 after discussion with the industry. This number has now spiralled to more than 100. The European Federation of Bankers has told the ECB that its initial cost and merits exercise is no longer valid because of the increasing complexity.
So the ECB will now try to persuade an unconvinced industry of the benefits that such a database will bring—the business case for banks, even.
AnaCredit's positive impact on stability and growth in the eurozone can be summarized in a number of ways. Monetary policymakers will have better statistics and be able to perform more sophisticated research, leading to growth—for example, by facilitating better credit lines to small and medium-sized enterprises, a key sector of focus for the European Commission's Capital Markets Union project. Supervisors will have a clearer view into financial institutions and inter-bank relationships, without even having to ask banks themselves for sensitive information. AnaCredit regulation could drive adoption of the legal entity identifier (LEI), even among smaller institutions that are not the main focus of LEI efforts.
It's also reasonable to expect that the ECB can realize these benefits: it need only point at the Central Securities Database—a kind of AnaCredit for debt securities—as an example of its experience.
But a more stable and growing eurozone must seem an abstract and long-term vision for pressured financial institutions as they count the costs of the IT proejcts AnaCredit will bring. If done right, implementing AnaCredit reporting will give firms' systems a spring clean; but sprucing up the technology estate does not itself a business case make.
For those institutions already having to report similar-but-slightly-different aggregated credit risk and liquidity calculations, it will be hard to see the value in yet another reporting template, particularly one of this granularity.
The ECB might reason that with highly automated and integrated systems, as required by AnaCredit, banks will end up finding granular reporting easier and cheaper than aggregated reporting. But the fact remains that institutions will still have to do this aggregated reporting, and not only to regulators but also to local central credit registers.
The only way the ECB is going to be able to assuage the concerns of the market is by doing away with redundancy and overlap as much as is possible.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Nasdaq reshuffles tech divisions post-Adenza
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering