Mifid II’s Reference Data Problems Drag On

Nearly half a year after Mifid II went live, sticky reference data issues are standing in the way of smooth compliance operations.

In the initial days of the new regime, the problems consisted mostly of technical troubles with reporting, with some regulators and Approved Reporting Mechanisms (ARMs) experiencing shutdowns. Now, nearly six months post-implementation, most of those early, post-go-live wrinkles have been ironed out, though firms, vendors and data experts report that they continue to deal with some stubborn data problems—primarily around instrument reference data and identifying execution venues.

“Out of the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: