Power to the People: Will MiFID II Data Disaggregation Deliver on Cost Control Promises?
MiFID II’s data disaggregation requirements aim to reduce data costs by forcing marketplaces to unbundle datasets and sell consumers only the specific data they need. But in reality, this seemingly simple and cost-reducing idea could make buying and selling data more complicated, and introduce new cost burdens, as Joanne Faulkner discovers.
Initially, some had hoped that MiFID II would introduce caps on market data fees, though they were left disappointed. Instead, the European Commission’s Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) 14 instructs trading venues to make pre-trade and post-trade data, which has traditionally been “bundled” together, available to the public in an “unbundled” fashion—i.e., broken up into separate data items. The EC says these requirements will “reduce market data costs for market participants by allowing them
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Row breaks out over cause of FX settlement fails
One European bank blames T+1 for a 50% jump in FX fails, but industry groups dispute the claims.
DTCC revamps tech abilities following global reporting overhaul
The Repository & Derivatives Services unit is implementing new technologies to help its clients keep up with changing reg reporting regimes.
When it comes to cybersec, the walls of separation are too high
Waters Wrap: Anthony examines some recent statements made by prominent cybersecurity experts and why those words might ring hollow.
Goldman’s credit reporting proposal sparks criticism
The shift to end-of-day and next-day reporting on large portfolio trades is seen as a step back for transparency.
Digital assets: A delicate balance between opportunity and risk
The SIX Digital Assets Regulatory & Tax Service is designed to unify fragmented data sources and provide clarity around digital assets.
Invite us to your cyber war games, Finra urges members
Regulators and broker-dealers would both benefit if watchdogs had a seat at the table during these exercises, says a Finra senior exec.
The US Treasury market preps for plumbing overhaul
Changes are coming to the US Treasury market with potential new clearing houses, access models, and more flow as the industry gets ready to meet the SEC’s first deadline for central clearing.
Reporting overhaul: the EU’s near-impossible balancing act
Regulators must weigh their desire to streamline derivatives reporting against the need to gather crucial trade data.
