On the Fence About Fintech Regulations
Differing sides of the financial technology regulation debate each make sense, which is why choosing a side is difficult.
Regulation has always been a hot topic, but lately it seems to be the only thing anyone talks about. Waters has been covering developments around this topic since it was founded more than 20 years ago—after all, this publication focuses on all technologies that capital markets firms use to support their operations. And so, by way of conversations with people in the industry, I thought I might be able to form an opinion on the matter. But I really can’t pick a side.
Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain represent a whole new realm for many regulatory agencies. As these innovations change the way the financial industry functions, agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must figure out how to fold these technologies into current policies—many of which were designed and implemented decades before the current wave of innovation. It’s been interesting to hear ideas about how to ensure that certain risks associated with developing, adopting and implementing new technologies are adequately mitigated.
Collaboration
Recently, I had the chance to listen to Beth Knickerbocker, chief innovation officer of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), speak about this very topic at an industry conference. She said the OCC is actively trying to work with fintech firms to understand emerging technologies and how these could be applied to the industry. “Regulation is not going anywhere and we have to act in a safe and sound manner,” Knickerbocker said, pointing out that the financial industry has a direct impact on the world’s economy.
Last year, the OCC announced that it would consider chartering financial technology companies as special-purpose national banks. The SEC also offered to work with firms while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) launched its own fintech initiative—LabCFTC—which includes an office that can guide new startups through its policies. Indeed, the CFTC’s approach to fintech, spearheaded by Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo, is well-regarded in the wider industry.
But there are recurrent problems. Regulators, particularly the CFTC, prefer it when technologists practice what it calls “responsible innovation,” one of those terms crafted by career lawyers, and honestly, I’m not sure what it means. I’m not the only one.
Fintech firms often say they’re in favor of regulation, but that enthusiasm only stretches to the point where they’re told “no.” The favored protest to enhanced oversight, as many people have told me, is that innovation is hard to achieve when there are many rules governing it. Building something from scratch means having the courage to fail many times, and being able to tap into a larger world of ideas without getting bogged down by practicality.
On the one hand, these development concerns are valid. After all, it is hard to bring something back to Earth when it was built to go beyond it. But I also believe that innovation can happen if developers are forced to think inside the box as well, to see how they can work out a problem from within the confines of a regulated entity.
On the other hand, the rules for an entire industry can’t just change because someone is convinced their product needs them to, and the financial markets are not a videogame—as per Knickerbocker’s point, they have an impact on everyone’s lives. Regulations are important to protect people and investors, and to ensure stable markets. Fintech is not without its share of predators, as recent SEC and CFTC enforcement actions around digital currencies have shown.
I don’t know if regulatory agencies can realistically design, let alone enforce, any rules they come up with around financial technology. But I am a firm believer in sunlight being the best disinfectant.
Regulation may be uncomfortable, and at times prohibitive, but what I do know for sure is that there is a need to continue having this discussion, so that all the issues are brought to light. It can only make the industry, the regulators and the new technologies that much better. Just don’t ask me to pick a side.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Nasdaq reshuffles tech divisions post-Adenza