Who is at fault for Goldman Sachs’s $5.5 million fine?
While the CFTC says the bank is to blame for record-keeping failures that transpired at the start of the pandemic, others say it was two vendors who let the bank down.
This past August, Goldman Sachs found itself in the crosshairs of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The regulator charged that the bank had both violated a cease-and-desist provision of a prior order and committed record-keeping violations where the firm did not properly record and retain specific audio files. The CFTC ordered Goldman to pay $5.5 million as a penalty.
That order did not specifically name the vendors whose technology was at the center of the case, but one of the agency’s
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Reporting overhaul: the EU’s near-impossible balancing act
Regulators must weigh their desire to streamline derivatives reporting against the need to gather crucial trade data.
The SIX Digital Assets Regulatory & Tax Service—Simplifying regulatory compliance
SIX‘s Digital Assets Regulatory & Tax Service is designed to simplify regulations and tax directives governing digital assets, making regulatory compliance more straightforward
Ediphy challenges FCA, Sterling launches new OMS, and more
The UK bond tape is halted, LSEG and Databricks partner, Wells Fargo adopts TransFICC’s One API, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 332: DTCC’s Val Wotton
This week, Val Wotton joins the podcast to discuss the necessary steps leading up to the T+1 transitions in the UK and EU.
DORA delay leaves EU banks fighting for their audit rights
The regulation requires firms to expand scrutiny of critical vendors that haven’t yet been identified.
Citi gears up for EU T+1 climb
The bank has a dedicated team examining what it needs to do to ensure a successful transition to T+1 in Europe.
The great disappearing internet—and what it could mean for your LLM
AI-generated content, bots, disinfo, ads, and censorship are killing the internet. As more of life continues to happen online, we might consider whether we’re building castles atop a rotting foundation.
AI’s next gig: The rising cost of off-channel communications compliance
As the cost of analyzing communications increases, what tools can firms deploy to save time and money while avoiding penalties?
