The MiFID II Migraine
I haven’t yet fully digested the 196-page proposal for the second draft of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) or the lighter 60-page proposal on the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) that was published by the European Commission on Oct. 20, but I’ve skimmed them. Based on what I have read, I would definitely be long in Bayer and other aspirin manufactures.
The industry is in for a multi-year migraine as it prepares for and ultimately complies with the new regulations. Unlike Mifid, which took effect in 2007, Mifir will share its love across every desk at an investment bank.
So, shooting from the hip, I'll rate a few of Mifid II’s major components, from zero aspirins for no pain, to 10 aspirins for "Please leave me in a quiet, dark room and make the world go away.”
Regulating algorithmic equities traders: 5 aspirins
Compared to other business lines in the bank, I feel that the equities desks are probably getting off the lightest under the new regulation. The European Commission would rather pursue high-frequency trading "in terms of robust risk management and operational safeguards.” To start, global banks can leverage their experience with the 15c3-5 pre-trade risk rule from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is set to go live next month.
These days, when I hear regulators discussing risk management, they seem to take a holistic view of a client's risk exposure across all asset classes, rather than simply by instrument type. Delivering this capability in real-time across the enterprise would definitely be worth another five aspirins.
Creating a consolidated trade data feed: 3 aspirins
From a technology perspective, all the components are there to create a consolidated post-trade feed. It's just an issue of having the exchanges and market data aggregators rowing in the same direction.
Establishing non-equities organized trading facilities (OTFs): 7 aspirins
Creating a matching platform for relatively illiquid markets is a technological no-brainer for banks that already operate dark liquidity pools and multilateral trading facilities (MTFs). Nevertheless, as Dodd–Frank has shown in the US, the major issue will be tweaking or replacing the various over-the-counter (OTC) trading and management systems that never had to do the same level of regulatory reporting as equities trading systems did.
Increasing investor protection for complex financial and structured instruments: 10 aspirins
Why is it that all the simple-sounding projects wind up causing firms to build new systems from scratch, essentially re-inventing the wheel? I have a feeling this proposal will make banks think back to the good old days when they were developing their best-execution policies and classifying their clients into the proper investor profile. I have no idea how firms will determine how new and bespoke products are appropriate for their various institutional clients. I cannot envision the regulators tackling this in a prescriptive fashion, which means firms might be left to creating their own internal processes that will need to hold up to regulatory scrutiny.
Don’t get me wrong; I appreciate the Commission's goal of ensuring a level playing field, transparent market and improving investor safeguards. They are noble, but they ensure a larger percentage of IT budgets will go toward meeting regulations rather than innovating in the markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
European firms prime for lopsided settlement in North America and at home
With T+1 imminent in North America and increasingly likely to traverse the Atlantic, operations and trading professionals in Europe are fighting on two fronts.
As crypto ETFs become reality, benchmark providers take center stage
The SEC’s approval of the first spot bitcoin ETFs will expose a growing number of traditional market participants to the maturing world of crypto data, a moment that some—such as CF Benchmarks, BlackRock’s benchmark provider—have been eagerly awaiting.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Looking into the EU regulatory landscape
Eflow’s Ben Parker joins the podcast to discuss EU regulations.
FCA declines to directly regulate market data prices
A year-long investigation by the UK regulator to determine whether competition is hindered in the wholesale data markets has concluded with its decision not to directly regulate much-maligned data pricing and licensing structures.
Most read
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won
- Witad Awards 2024: Above and beyond award (vendor)—Susan Bennett, Tradeweb
- Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest