Cranking Up To Eleven
Every conference agenda, and nearly every conversation regarding data, now has an element of big data to it. From Doug Laney's original Three Vs definition of velocity, variety and volume through to the more multifaceted understanding now, debate still rages over the key point regarding big data itself ─ is it actually happening?
Yes, is the simple answer. It's impossible to argue against the idea that datasets are getting bigger, that they're coming from many different sources and the time horizons for processing them are shrinking, whether that's due to technology development or function demand. But there's also an argument for no, as well. Big data, by its very definition, has always been there from a pure development perspective, in that it's the upper limit of what we can feasibly process in realistic timeframes, and what's beyond the ken of current computing ability.
Relativism and Realism
Taking that explanation into account, big data itself isn't actually a distinct phenomenon, but an intrinsic part of data usage, structured or otherwise. Labeling it as such, some argue, betrays a lack of understanding about the essence of information usage ─ it will always get bigger, and there will always be a limit. Finite resources and all that.
But neither seems particularly correct, and both have an element of facetiousness to their basic descriptions. Yes, data sets get bigger with the iterative expansion of computer power. Yes, what was considered big data even ten years ago, for instance, the organic database of every position across a large investment firm's enterprise, updated with corporate actions and projection logic, can comfortably fit onto most peoples' iPhones today. But given the level of electronic expansion in the past decade, and the consummate bloating of data generated, what we currently experience in terms of data growth is far beyond the precedent.
It's all relative, of course. The level of data that Google takes in, as an extreme example, is far in excess of what a small brokerage in the south of England may concern itself with. But both experience the same essential requirement ─ even for the small company, the addition of an extra source of market data, and incoming regulations over record keeping present it with a big data issue of processing and storage, even if it's not on a par with the sheer amount of data that Google deals with. Without reconciling two separate industries, as well, a tier-one investment bank with retail operations will generate an enormous level of data that fits what is becoming the traditional big data paradigm, but a small regional bank will also struggle with increased electronification and the information that produces as well.
The level of data that Google takes in, as an extreme example, is far in excess of what a small brokerage in the south of England may concern itself with. But both experience the same essential requirement.
Living, Breathing
But even the issue becomes the process eventually. Take our coverage of big data at Waters, for instance. A while back, I filed a lengthy story on the basics of big data, and we decided that, as a rule going forward, we would capitalize the words in order to differentiate the idea of big data from the fact that there was a large amount of data. Last week, we decided to revert to non-capitalized forms, as the concept is so widespread now that it almost seems ridiculous to refer to it as a proper noun.
In summary, I'm falling somewhere between the lines, as arguably should be the case as a journalist. While I agree that data naturally evolves and expands, I also think that the sharp incline, plotted on the metaphorical graph, can't be ignored. But I'm mainly interested in what you, the end users and the experts, think.
The keen readers among you, finally, may also have noticed a new byline on the staff this past week. Marina Daras, formerly of Private Banker International and Investment Europe, among other titles, joins us in London as our European staff writer. She can be reached at marina.daras@incisivemedia.com.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Data infrastructure must keep pace with pension funds’ private market ambitions
As private markets grow in the UK, Keith Viverito says the infrastructure that underpins the sector needs to be improved, or these initiatives will fail.
AI enthusiasts are running before they can walk
The IMD Wrap: As firms race to implement generative and agentic AI, having solid data foundations is crucial, but Wei-Shen wonders how many have put those foundations in.
Jump Trading spinoff Pyth enters institutional market data
The data oracle has introduced Pyth Pro as it seeks to compete with the traditional players in market data more directly.
50% of firms are using AI or ML to spot data quality issues
How does your firm stack up?
FCA files to lift UK bond tape suspension, says legal claims ‘without merit’
After losing the bid for the UK’s bond CT, Ediphy sued the UK regulator, halting the tape’s implementation. Now, the FCA is asking the UK’s High Court to end the suspension and allow it to fight Ediphy’s claims in parallel.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 339: Northern Trust Asset Management’s Jan Rohof
This week, Jan Rohof from Northern Trust Asset Management joins to discuss how asset managers and quants get more context from data.
Tokenization & Private Markets: Where mixed data finds a needed partner?
Waters Wrap: Reading the tea leaves, Anthony predicts BlackRock’s Preqin deal, Securitize’s IPO, and numerous public comments from industry leaders are just the tip of the iceberg.
Plaintiffs propose to represent all non-database Cusip licensees in last 7 years
If granted, the recent motion for class certification in the ongoing case against Cusip Global Services would allow end-user firms and third-party data vendors alike to join the lawsuit.