May 2011: Don't Hurry, Be Happy

victor-anderson
Victor Anderson, Editor-in-Chief, WatersTechnology

Thirteen years ago, I was a teacher and I’m happy to say that I still have fond memories of the decade or so I spent at all-boy independent boarding schools in South Africa. I often find myself contemplating conversations I had with the students, many of which centered on what it means to be happy.

I remember chatting with the seniors fairly late into the evenings while I was on duty—there was a certain inevitability about the manner in with the conversation meandered its way to the subject of happiness and contentedness, which yielded an astonishing number of debates. I’m sure the social scientists among our ranks will be able to disabuse me of my misapprehension between those two states of being—my response leaned toward perceiving them as one and the same thing. My argument, therefore, went something like this: “You will never be happy and content until you accept that what you have is enough and that do not want or need more.”

That’s a pretty simple line of reasoning, one that you may or may not agree with, but when the notion of relative deprivation—a state of mind responsible for more unhappiness in western cultures than any other—is added to the mix, the unavoidable consequence is universal unhappiness and discontent.

The point of this seemingly random walk down philosophy lane is its relevance to our industry. During conversations I had with Ciena’s Tom Mock and NYSE Euronext’s Andrew Bach, what occurred to me is the extent to which the industry fixates on speed, especially in the high-frequency trading space, at the expense of other trading-related variables. Firms seem seduced by the never-ending cycle of latency reduction, the natural end point of which is near-zero latency—basically, light speed. Much in the same way that I proposed that you’re never likely to be content until you accept that what you have is sufficient, financial organizations would do better to partner with a service provider offering industry-standard connection speeds, and instead focus their efforts on improving the quality of their internal trading infrastructure, the suitability of their algorithms, and their research and investment decisions. This is especially pertinent to buy-side organizations, many of which have legacy infrastructures that contribute significantly to latency even before orders are fired into the market.  

And as for high-frequency shops using out-of-date or sub-par algorithms, routing orders to the market at the fastest possible speed will help them realize one thing: how far out of the money they are—they’ll just get to realize it that much faster.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income

Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here