Corporate Actions Processing's Slow Boil

In poll questions asked during Inside Reference Data's webcast last week concerning corporate actions issues, respondents indicated that reducing operational risk was an important priority driving greater automation. When asked to indicate which of several parts of the corporate actions lifecycle their firms had automated, 55% cited event management, while other parts of the cycle, such as position management (39%), election management (26%), and entitlement calculation and posting (24%) each had less than half or close to a quarter of respondents automating them.
These two sets of results are certainly consistent—if reducing operational risk is seen as the most important reason to automate corporate actions processing then it should follow that most firms will have event management systems in place before anything else. Managing positions, shareholder votes and dividend calculations are not as relevant to operational risk for companies.
But a question comes to mind. If our poll is truly representative of what's happening in the industry, is having event management systems in place at 55% of firms really enough to avoid serious operational risk issues arising when corporate actions are processed and the resulting data produced?
Maybe not. But it might be the best the industry can currently do, because so many asset managers still are using faxes for corporate actions, as Invesco's Joel Brown pointed out during the webcast. "Just because you're able to automate doesn't mean others in the chain are able to," he said.
Another reason why it may be hard to automate corporate actions events is because the events need to be managed, as Alan Jones of SmartStream noted in the webcast. The latter pieces of the process, after the action event, are less conducive to automation.
It is the exceptions that keep corporate actions professionals up at night, as Brown said. Perhaps certain aspects of preparing the event can be automated, which is why 55% say they have event management systems in place. But does corporate actions differ so much from other aspects of data management that it's the one place where automation is counterproductive?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Nasdaq looks to Thailand, Broadridge grows patent portfolio, GenAI concerns, and more
The Waters Cooler: MarketAxess gains majority control of RFQ consortium, the Bloomberg Terminal integrates with BNP’s Exane, and Isda extends reg reporting support to new Canadian rules in this week’s news roundup.
Growing pains: Why good data and fortitude are crucial for banks’ tech projects
The IMD Wrap: Max examines recent WatersTechnology deep dives into long-term technology projects at several firms and the role data plays in those efforts.
Overnight trading gets another boost with deal between FactSet’s LiquidityBook and Blue Ocean
FactSet’s recently acquired LiquidityBook OMS will grant buy-side clients access to overnight trading on Blue Ocean.
Optiver relies on BMLL market data for quant strategy
The market-maker has built its trading business on top of BMLL’s Level 3 data. But the collaboration is young, and the pair have grand plans to make options the next quant frontier.
Bloomberg expands IBVAL; the SIPs and 24/5 trading; Broadridge’s agentic play, and more
The Waters Cooler: State Street embraces interop, Citi’s CIO outlines the XiNG risk platform, power companies explore alternative nuclear supply options to datacenters, and more.
State Street’s interop play for FX and easing technical debt
Waters Wrap: About six years ago, State Street partnered with Interop.io to tie together its GlobalLINK suite of platforms. Anthony explores how this plays into the “reuse” mantra.
LSEG-AWS extend partnership, Deutsche Bank’s AI plans, GenAI (and regular AI) concerns, and more
The Waters Cooler: Nasdaq and MTFs bicker about data fees, Craig Donohue to take the reins at Cboe, and Clearwater closes its Beacon deal, in this week’s news roundup.
From server farms to actual farms, ‘reuse and recycle’ is a winning strategy
The IMD Wrap: Max looks at the innovative ways that capital markets are applying the principles of “reduce, reuse, and recycle” to promote efficiency and keep datacenters running.