Aviva Investors Fined £17.6m by FCA Over Risk Management Failings
Asset management business also pays out £132m to eight funds in compensation.
The FCA found that between June 2008 and May 2013, Aviva Investors implemented a management strategy on areas of its fixed income desks where funds that paid differing levels of performance fees were managed by the same desk, resulting in "conflicts of interest not being managed fairly".
The asset management business found that in May 2013, two former fixed income traders were found to have delayed recording executed trades by several hours, thereby benefiting from intraday price movements, a practice referred to as "cherry picking".
Aviva Investors, which manages approximately £240 billion in assets, has already reached a settlement with the regulator in "an exceptionally open and cooperative manner" and has made compensation payments of £132 million to the eight impacted funds.
"Ensuring that conflicts of interest are properly managed is central to the relationship of trust that must exist between asset managers and their customers. It is also a fundamental regulatory requirement," says Georgina Philippou, acting director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA. "While Aviva Investors' failings were serious, the FCA has recognized that its actions since reporting its failings were exceptional."
"We fully accept the conclusions of this investigation," said Euan Munro, chief executive officer of Aviva Investors, in a statement. "We have fixed the issues, improved our systems and controls, and ensured no customers have been disadvantaged."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Banks hope new axe platform will cut bond trading costs
Dealer-backed TP Icap venture aims to disrupt dominant trio of Bloomberg, MarketAxess and Tradeweb.
Editor’s Picks: Our best from 2025
Anthony Malakian picks out 10 stories from the past 12 months that set the stage for the new year.
The next phase of AI in capital markets: from generative to agentic
A look at some of the more interesting projects involving advanced forms of AI from the past year.
Will overnight trading in equity markets expand next year? It’s complicated.
The potential for expanded overnight trading in US equity markets sparked debate this year, whether people liked it or not.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 13 years of our best content.
The total portfolio approach gains momentum: Building the right tech foundation for success
The rationale for the TPA, and the crucial role technology plays in enabling such an approach
Google, CME say they’ve proved cloud can support HFT—now what?
After demonstrating in September that ultra-low-latency trading can be facilitated in the cloud, the exchange and tech giant are hoping to see barriers to entry come down.
Institutional priorities in multi-asset investing
Private markets, broader exposures and the race for integration