High-Frequency Trading Special Report

Click here to download the PDF
If the "stocks tornado" of May 6, which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average head
south to the tune of nearly 1,000 points, has taught us anything, it's that the highfrequency trading phenomenon is a very emotive issue. This is the last thing the
high-frequency boys needed, given the US Securities and Exchange Commission's
(SEC) well-publicized fi xation with such strategies, which came to a head by way of
James Brigagliano's testimony before the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment on October 28 last year. "This quicker access could, for example, enable high-frequency traders to successfully implement ‘momentum' strategies designed to prompt sharp price movements and then profi t from the resulting short-term volatility," he testifi ed. "In combination with a ‘liquidity detection' strategy that seeks solely to ascertain whether there is a large buyer or seller in the market (such as an institutional investor), a high-frequency trader may be able to profi t from trading ahead of the large order."
At the time, Brigagliano's comments seemed a little melodramatic, but last week's
fiasco suggests that perhaps he wasn't too wide of the mark. I bet he's smiling now,
though.
Brigagliano's testimony was backed up in mid-January this year when the SEC
voted 5-0 to publish its so-called concept release on high-frequency trading, dark
pools and the structure of markets, a document that sketches out the Commission's
concerns surrounding the much-maligned practice, and invites feedback from market
participants - traders, exchanges and brokerages - which in all likelihood will lay the
foundation upon which the agency's future high-frequency rules will be based.
SEC chairman Mary Schapiro was quoted in the US press on January 13 insinuating
that the Commission would act in investors' interests, which, given its primary reason
for being - investor protection in the wake of the October 1929 Wall Street crash (even though the SEC was only offi cially founded some fi ve years later) - means that the US regulator would be inclined to act sooner or later. "Trading has accelerated from seconds to milliseconds," Schapiro said. "At the Commission, we must continually assess how changes in the market are affecting investors."
With comments like that, the writing is pretty much on the wall, I'm afraid.
What isn't certain, however, is what these rules will look like in their fi nal form, or
indeed how far they will go to impinge upon a strategy that according to certain estimates accounts for as much as 70% of US stock volume. My guess is that the SEC
will impose the types of rules designed to restrict the "downside" associated with highfrequency trading, while simultaneously allowing such strategies to continue. The only problem with that tack is how they would go about it. That's anyone's guess.
Click here to download the PDF
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
The TNS–Radianz deal hints at underlying issues in trader voice
Waters Wrap: As part of its cost-cutting program, BT shipped its Radianz unit to TNS, but the deal didn’t include its Trading & Command trader voice property. Anthony finds that interesting.
OEMS interest sputters
Combined order and execution management systems once offered great promise, but large buy-side firms increasingly want specialization, leaving OEMS vendors to chase smaller asset managers in a world of EMS consolidation.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
DORA delay leaves EU banks fighting for their audit rights
The regulation requires firms to expand scrutiny of critical vendors that haven’t yet been identified.
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
Fintech powering LSEG’s AI Alerts dissolves
ModuleQ, a partner and investment of Refinitiv and then LSEG since 2018, was dissolved last week after it ran out of funding.
Halftime review: How top banks and asset managers are tackling projects beyond AI
Waters Wrap: Anthony highlights eight projects that aren’t centered around AI at some of the largest banks and asset managers.
Speakerbus goes bust, Broadridge buys Signal, banks mandate cyber training, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Federal Reserve is reserved on GenAI, FloQast partners with Deloitte Australia, UBS invests in Domino Data Lab, and more in this week’s roundup.