SEC-CFTC Find Flash-Crash Smoking Gun

After months of waiting for the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to release their joint report on the May 6 Flash Crash that roiled the US futures and equities markets, the world now knows the face of evil behind the crash—a volume-oriented sell algorithm that was trying to unload 75,000 e-mini contracts in the space of 20 minutes without regard to price or time.
Quiet honestly, I was disappointed to learn that the regulators were able to trace the source of the crash to a single trade. Mind you, I'm impressed that they have the ability to sift through such a huge amount of data to pinpoint the origin of the crisis. But as a former historian-in-training, I was hoping that it would have come down to such a confluence of events that academics would be chewing on it for decades to come, like the myriad factors that led to the Great Depression of the 1930s, rather than the cut-and-dried incident that sparked World War I.
The report provides good moment-by-moment coverage of the event, but it will be interesting to see how the regulators use this knowledge to prevent similar events from happening in the future.
A couple of positive takeaways from the report include improving the transparency on how regulators like Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) will break erroneous trades in the future, as well as setting up upper and lower limits around a trading price where traders know that a trade would be erroneous. The latter should keep actual trades from colliding with resting stub quotes on the book.
The most important lesson learned is that without having specialists acting as a market of last resort, tasked with providing "fair and orderly markets," the industry will have to get used to circuit breakers being tripped. The Flash Crash demonstrates that while high-frequency traders provide the lion's share of liquidity—along with a number of liquidity providers—there is nothing stopping them from stepping back from trading and accelerating a downward market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Trading Tools
Waters Wavelength
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Episode 226 (M&A and people)
On this episode of the Wavelength Podcast, Wei-Shen and Tony talk about the importance of communication when it comes to M&A activity within a company.
Subscribe to Weekly Wrap emails
Most read
- The curious case of Larry Fondren and DelphX
- Bloomberg RHub fee hike reflects cost pressures of regulatory reporting industry
- Itiviti’s Blueprint for Success—Investing in People and Products
- Esma: Both OTC identifiers will not be required in Emir reporting
- Waters Wrap: Microsoft’s capital markets play (And Algorithmics thoughts)