Does Speed Still Sell?

With that in mind, it's probably appropriate that it was a buy-side story that prompted the topic of this week's letter. For a while now, we've heard from people on the sell side that, while speed is important, it's not the ultimate determinant of success that it was once portrayed as. A lot of people now zone speed capabilities, where there are the lower third who aren't at all concerned with it, the mid-tier, who are fast enough to compete but do so among themselves, then the bleeding edge, for whom every millisecond counts.
But how much of an impact does this have? On the buy side, money is still being made, but in a far more limited manner than previously. High-frequency trading (HFT) shops simply aren't as profitable as they once were, whether it's due to regulation, the investment required to maintain technological superiority, or other reasons. On the sell side, many people that I speak to say that it's stability and quality that they're after, with speed as an added bonus. Yes, some brokers have done very well out of high-speed market access, particularly the Russian brokerage houses of late, but for the bulge brackets, it's just not as front-and-center as it once was.
Or is it?
Quite frankly, it depends on who you're asking. NYSE Euronext, for instance, still talks about time savings when introducing new networks, such as the microwave-based one it plans for London. Banks do a brisk trade in their low-latency platforms, such as Citi with Velocity, while (some) exchanges are copping a lot out of their co-location schemes.
But that's all around speed as an idea, without seeing the kind of frantic rush to take off fractions of a second that resulted in firms laying new lines between New York and Chicago, at enormous expense, a few years ago. It tends to be a thing for newer markets these days, where the faster connections to newly liberalized exchange landscapes, such as Australia, can net dollars.
Some people that I've spoken to, quite frankly, have said that speed is unattractive these days. They worry about the effect of things like the financial transaction tax or, more accurately, the psychology that indicates among the regulators and the wider public. Regardless of right or wrong, people seem to find something inherently disturbing about the very idea of HFT and high-speed trading through algorithms. But speed is necessary to compete, and expensive to maintain, leaving many firms in a quandary.
High-frequency trading (HFT) shops simply aren't as profitable as they once were, whether it's due to regulation, the investment required to maintain technological superiority, or other reason.
So yes, essentially, speed still sells, even if it's only the very edge that care about the milli/micro development. For others, it's expected.
In terms of more events, don't forget that the European Trading Architecture Summit is coming up, in London, on November 19. Details can be found here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Exchange M&A, US moratorium on AI regs dashed, Citi’s “fat-finger”-killer, and more
The Waters Cooler: Euronext-Athex, SIX-Aquis, Blue Ocean-Eventus, EDM Association, and more in this week’s news roundup.
LSEG officially sunsets Eikon
The exchange operator withdrew the platform from its product lineup this week.
Cloud Wars: Are EU and APAC firms really pining for homegrown options?
Waters Wrap: In the wake of tariffs and regional instability, there’s chatter about non-US firms lessening their dependency on the major hyperscalers. Anthony is not buying it.
Bloomberg, MTS expand portfolio trading to EGBs
The platform providers will follow Tradeweb with the extension of the popular credit protocol.
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
Google gifts Linux, capital raised for Canton, one less CTP bid, and more
The Waters Cooler: Banks team up for open-source AI controls, S&P injects GenAI into Capital IQ, and Goldman Sachs employees get their own AI assistant in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 323: MarketAxess’s Chowdhury and Burke (plus some Cusip updates)
This week, Riad Chowdhury, head of Asia-Pacific, and Dan Burke, global head of emerging markets at MarketAxess, join to discuss block trading in fixed income. Plus Reb discusses her recent article about Cusip and updates on the class action lawsuit moving through the courts.
As datacenter cooling issues rise, FPGAs could help
IMD Wrap: As temperatures are spiking, so too is demand for capacity related to AI applications. Max says FPGAs could help to ease the burden being forced on datacenters.