Datafeeds Special Report
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT
Different Feeds for Different Folks
Over the past 15 years, the datafeeds landscape has changed beyond recognition. Once the preserve of only the largest firms with the most demanding requirements in terms of volume and performance, with most capital markets participants relying on terminals to meet their data requirements, the efficiency and speed advantages of both consolidated and direct feeds won over users at large and small firms alike.
On the direct feed side, this was largely driven by two factors: trading firms wanting faster and direct sources of data to support evolving algorithmic trading operations, and exchanges looking for new revenues, bypassing traditional consolidators with their own direct feed infrastructures. And despite these efforts, consolidated feed use has also grown as trading operations become more globalized and firms began demanding access to markets where direct feeds are either impractical or simply don't exist.
But if speed was the driving factor for feeds, the current focus is on flexibility and performance, where "performance" covers a multitude of factors beyond just speed, including reliability, capacity management and cost. So firms must not only invest in high-performance infrastructures to handle these datafeeds, but also in sophisticated monitoring systems to measure speed, uptime and other factors─though unlike in the past, when these were used by small business units running alongside enterprise systems, high performance is now the standard. "Speed has become an expectation, not a driver," says Adam Honore, chief executive of financial technology business strategy consultancy MarketsTech LLC.
However, over the same period, attrition and mergers have meant that the once-booming market for data distribution platforms and ticker plants has shrunk significantly, with much of this infrastructure business consolidating around a de facto incumbent, and only a few smaller technology companies providing competing platforms─though usually with limited capabilities.
Increased data availability has inevitably led to commoditization, and so in addition to datafeeds, firms are now looking at analytics that can deliver additional value and insight into the raw data. And with more analytics being presented via apps to serve the needs of an increasingly mobile workforce, new delivery mechanisms, APIs and cloud data marts are a logical next step for many data consumers─though participants in this report's Q&A say these will coexist with, rather than replace, the current generation of datafeed solutions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Digital employees have BNY talking a new language
Julie Gerdeman, head of BNY’s data and analytics team, explains how the bank’s new operating model allows for quicker AI experimentation and development.
Can mastering data solve AI’s cognitive dissonance?
The IMD Wrap: Bank execs are still bullish on AI, but recent studies suggest it’s not the panacea they’re making it out to be. Can the two views be rectified?
Everything you need to know about market data in overnight equities trading
As overnight trading continues to capture attention, a growing number of data providers are taking in market data from alternative trading systems.
AI strategies could be pulling money into the data office
Benchmarking: As firms formalize AI strategies, some data offices are gaining attention and budget.
Identity resolution is key to future of tokenization
Firms should think not only about tokenization’s potential but also the underlying infrastructure and identity resolution, writes Cusip Global Services’ Matthew Bastian in this guest column.
Vendors are winning the AI buy-vs-build debate
Benchmarking: Most firms say proprietary LLM tools make up less than half of their AI capabilities as they revaluate earlier bets on building in-house.
Private markets boom exposes data weak points
As allocations to private market assets grow and are increasingly managed together with public market assets, firms need systems that enable different data types to coexist, says GoldenSource’s James Corrigan.
Banks hate data lineage, but regulators keep demanding it
Benchmarking: As firms automate regulatory reporting, a key BCBS 239 requirement is falling behind, raising questions about how much lineage banks really need.