
Open Platform: Starting Blocks and Auction Blocks - The Importance of a Strong Start and Finish in Setting Prices
Oliver Albers, vice president of Global Information Services at Nasdaq, argues the case for the value of opening and closing auction processes, and the value of the data they create.
Listed equities begin and end trading with opening and closing auctions—also known as “crosses.” These concentrate liquidity, bringing together buyers and sellers for the initial and final trades of the market day. They provide a very efficient price discovery mechanism that makes it easier to execute larger block-sized orders without significant market impact on price.
The auctions have always been an essential function of the market by providing liquidity events and setting essential benchmark prices for trillions of dollars in assets. However, the stunning growth in the popularity of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other passive investments have made the way these crosses function even more important to a larger universe of market professionals and investors because these investments rely heavily on the official closing prices of the stocks in their benchmark indexes—and it is the closing auctions that set these prices. Indeed, global institutional assets under management (AUM) for passive strategies grew to 22 percent of total AUM in 2015, from just 14 percent in 2008, according to Greenwich Associates’ Trading the Auctions report. Meanwhile, closing auction volume has increased substantially, from 3.6 percent of total daily volume in 2011to 5.5 percent today, according to the report.

Importantly, it’s not just the passive strategies that are impacting volume at the crosses. Passive investment participation attracts additional liquidity, increasing momentum and creating a stronger liquidity growth cycle. Traders using strategies that interact with the order flow from this passive money also play a role. For example, the use of guaranteed “market-on-open” or “market-on-close” strategies increased from 5 percent of portfolio trading in 2015 to 14 percent last year, according to Greenwich Associates.
The growth in these types of trades suggests that to work most effectively with the opening and closing auctions, market participants must truly understand how exchanges build liquidity during the crosses, as well as understanding the data available to them—specifically the exchanges’ auction feeds. The Greenwich Associates study found that the auction information may be under-utilized, which could be detrimental to traders looking to participate efficiently in these liquidity events. Traders either do not have adequate access to the auction feeds or are not using them optimally, regardless of the provider. “Knowing supply and demand in real time improves efficiency,” said one agency broker-dealer surveyed by the study.
Just as swimmers in a 100-meter freestyle need to understand how to strategically begin and end the race, traders must understand how each exchange operates its crosses, at the start and at the finish—the times when liquidity is most concentrated, and buyers and sellers are most active.
To begin, while individual equities today trade on a variety of exchanges, only the primary listing exchange is used to set a stock’s official opening and closing prices—the official closing prices that form the input to the index calculations used by ETFs and other passive strategies. Overall, the crosses are an innovative, flexible solution tailored to fit many aspects of how markets operate.
All exchanges follow the same general approach to the opening and closing auctions. Each defines a cutoff time—either in the morning for opening crosses, or late afternoon for the market close—before which all orders to be executed during the auction must be submitted. This creates a period when liquidity for the auction can build. Once the cutoff time is reached, these orders may not be canceled, and—with the exception of imbalance orders, where new orders can be submitted to offset an imbalance between buy and sell orders after the cutoff time—new orders cannot be entered. At this point, data about the state of the auction is published on the exchanges’ auction feeds.
The importance of robust and timely auction data should be obvious. To effectively use imbalance orders, traders must have access to real-time data about these imbalances. The auction data feeds typically provide: (1) indicative price, where the price would be set if the auction were held immediately; (2) paired shares, or the number of shares that could be matched at the indicative price; and (3) imbalance, which is calculated by subtracting sell orders from buy orders.
Since the imbalance data was a new data point in 2003 when Nasdaq launched its crosses, we worked extensively with brokers, data vendors and front-end providers to ensure that this information was broadly available in a usable format for all investors. Markets need transparency for efficient price discovery and to provide a certain level of comfort to the broader trading community. Our Nasdaq TotalView auction feed provides transparent information about liquidity concentrations and opportunities at the open and close, essentially identifying the ultimate auction cross volume within 95 percent accuracy compared to other exchange-operated products.
Today, nearly 7 percent of daily trading volume takes place during the crosses. This sheer size of volume makes it critical for traders and investors to truly understand how to leverage this beneficial feature of market structure to discover more effective prices and trading opportunities.
Just as each exchange auction operates in a slightly different manner, the type of information provided by the auctions also varies from exchange to exchange. Market participants should ensure that they understand these differences to tailor their trading strategies accordingly.
Indeed, 70 percent of respondents in the Greenwich Associates survey said access to real-time auction imbalance data influenced how their firms traded. That level of demand for auction analytics tells us the level of importance this kind of trading is today and will be for the foreseeable future. Just as competitive swimmers know to focus on their strong start and finish, traders are honing their ability to better understand their strengths in order to better trade the opening and closing auctions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Growing pains: Why good data and fortitude are crucial for banks’ tech projects
The IMD Wrap: Max examines recent WatersTechnology deep dives into long-term technology projects at several firms and the role data plays in those efforts.
Investing in the invisible, ING plots a tech renaissance
Voice of the CTO: Less than a year in the job, Daniele Tonella delves into ING’s global data platform, gives his thoughts on the future of Agile development, and talks about the importance of “invisible controls” for tech development.
Optiver relies on BMLL market data for quant strategy
The market-maker has built its trading business on top of BMLL’s Level 3 data. But the collaboration is young, and the pair have grand plans to make options the next quant frontier.
Bloomberg expands IBVAL; the SIPs and 24/5 trading; Broadridge’s agentic play, and more
The Waters Cooler: State Street embraces interop, Citi’s CIO outlines the XiNG risk platform, power companies explore alternative nuclear supply options to datacenters, and more.
As costs rise, buy-side CIOs urge caution on AI
Conference attendees encouraged asset managers to tread carefully when looking to deploy AI-driven solutions, citing high cost pressures.
XiNG: Inside Citi’s all-encompassing risk platform
Voice of the CTO: Citi’s chief information officer, Jon Lofthouse, explains how and why the bank has extended its enterprise-wide risk platform so that every trade in any asset class goes through it.
Demand for private markets data turns users into providers
Buy-side firms seeking standardized, user-friendly datasets are turning toward a new section of the alternatives market to get their fix—each other.
LSEG-AWS extend partnership, Deutsche Bank’s AI plans, GenAI (and regular AI) concerns, and more
The Waters Cooler: Nasdaq and MTFs bicker about data fees, Craig Donohue to take the reins at Cboe, and Clearwater closes its Beacon deal, in this week’s news roundup.