Banks, asset managers weigh trade-offs in third-party tools for machine learning

Although many banks and asset managers still prefer to build models in-house, off-the-shelf products are maturing.

weight

“Build versus buy” is an age-old conundrum in most aspects of financial services enterprise technology. That is no less true for emerging technologies like machine learning than it has been in other, more traditional parts of firms’ tech estates. While off-the-shelf products have improved hugely, and no- and low-code platforms promise to make building models a breeze, many organizations still prefer to build their own algorithms and models.

Andy McMahon, machine-learning engineering lead at

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Nasdaq reshuffles tech divisions post-Adenza

Adenza is now fully integrated into the exchange operator’s ecosystem, bringing opportunities for new business and a fresh perspective on how fintech fits into its strategy.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here