The Data Right

Political issues are increasingly important for
private companies, and people want shared services-
as long as someone else is footing the bill. For
some, these are the day-to-day features of doing
business in economies based on socialist principles.
For others, it describes what the reference data
industry is increasingly faced with.
The utility, something the dictionary would
describe as a public service like water, is now
becoming a well-known concept in the reference
data market. Market participants are talking about
a need to share and collaborate, and firms are
dedicating more and more resources to sending
comment letters to regulators and following politics.
Some have even found themselves clocking
up air miles en route to Washington, DC. In fact, if
all my connections had been using TripIt to share
their whereabouts, I'm certain the last couple of
months would have shown a spike in people going
to the capital.
The reason is that there are a large number of
organizations interested in playing a role in the
legal entity identification process, currently being
debated by US regulators. Some want to be the
registration authority for an identifier, and some
want to take responsibility for the operational
aspects. It is the operational part of this discussion
that is linked to the concept of a utility. The
pro-utility camp sees this being the start of an
industry-wide reference data utility-and this is
the camp that seems to make the most noise.
But this month, I've spoken to a large number
of people about how the utility model could work
in the reference data market, and one group of
market participants is not convinced data will be
managed in an industry-wide utility in the future.
This group of people may not go to conferences
and do a presentation on why utilities do not
excite them, and they may not be talking to peers
about this topic. They simply see the industry as
having other things to worry about. Some would
ask me about who was mentioning this word
‘utility,' and others would seem less interested,
citing hurdles related to governance and ownership.
For this camp, the overriding theme is that
capitalism still reins.
It may seem like the industry has adopted
socialist principles in recent times, but it is important
to remember that it is not all about sharing.
There are still companies out there that have to
meet shareholder expectations and constantly
thrive to improve services and offerings to
generate higher profit margins. Although some say
reference data is like water, there is a significant
difference-clean water is a human right, and
clean reference data is not.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.