As We Predicted

Thinking about what matters in the reference data space for this week's column, it may seem like the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) designation of Swift and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) to administer the CFTC Interim Compliant Identifiers (CICI) left some issues to be resolved, especially about how CICIs might need to be updated or scrubbed in some way to synchronize with legal entity identifiers (LEIs).
CICI operates using the ISO 17442 messaging standard, as will the LEI, so any transition should be seamless, according to Swift. The question some are asking, however, is whether the CICI will fit the global LEI framework, which is akin to asking, ‘Will the US LEI fit the global LEI?' and, really, how will local operating units' implementation of the LEI square with each other's and the overarching global standard? These are really the same questions that were out there before the CFTC decision.
What the CFTC naming of Swift and DTCC really does is show that the view expressed here on May 4 was very much on the mark—that Swift should not be counted out from consideration as an LEI administrator.
Winning the CFTC designation to run CICI is an important signal to global authorities making decisions concerning the LEI, such as ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) that Swift (and DTCC) have merit as administrators, and shouldn't be counted out lightly.
Critics may say that administering the identifiers, whether CICI or the LEI, shouldn't be left to the financial industry at all, because the issues the identifiers have been established to track and prevent are what caused the most recent financial crisis as well as other more recent scandals. The distinction that gets lost, however, is that organizations like depositories and messaging utilities aren't the ones causing crises, but have been instrumental in sorting out wreckage when something like the Lehman Brothers collapse happens, and have expertise to do so.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Asic probe piles pressure on ASX to deliver Chess replacement
But market insiders think late intervention by regulators could even slow down implementation.
Stakes raised for UK bond, EU derivatives tapes after Ediphy clinches win
The pressure is on for TransFICC, Etrading, Finbourne, and Propellant Digital, who are still vying to provide the UK’s fixed income consolidated tape after Esma awarded the EU’s tape to Ediphy and its partners.
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.