Wake-Up Calls
As a new father, I'm getting used to being alerted to very pressing and immediate needs. That also appears to be happening in the feature stories we present to you in this issue, covering topics such as semantic data, trade identifiers, front and back office data dialogues, non-display data usage and also the ever-present topic of big data.
Semantic data technology, as David Newman of the EDM Council tells us, is catching the industry's attention for the operational benefits it can provide. Semantic technology can be used to present data in a way that both people and machines can understand. That makes it more likely that firms can cost-effectively identify and monitor data, by using logical concepts.
The European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), which includes trade reporting requirements that took effect February 12, as noted in last month's issue, has gotten the industry's attention by establishing Unique Trade Identifiers (UTIs). Nicholas Hamilton delves more deeply into what is involved in working with UTIs. UTIs have been a challenge, in part because specifications for them were incomplete right up until the day before the EMIR deadline. For many firms, this last-minute bit of guidance required them to revise the working definitions they had come up with based on the little they knew.
Front and back offices have had a longstanding rivalry and mutual suspicion-or even mutual contempt. Nonetheless, reference data professionals are taking notice that navigating this divide is increasingly necessary to make constructive progress on their issues.
A policy recommendation issued by a FISD working group is the opening salvo of what could become a fight over fees to obtain non-display data. FISD's Business Issues Policy and Procedures (BIPPS) group asserts that delayed and end-of-day non-display data should have lesser or no fees compared to what is charged for real-time non-display data. The group's reasoning is that less timely forms of this data are neither valuable nor trackable. But the group's membership includes exchanges, some of whom would certainly like to be charging more for all forms of data generated by their activity.
Why does big data still puzzle some in the industry, and face barriers to adoption? That's another facet of data management attracting attention. In "Work in Progress," we hear about how and why many firms are revising their big data strategies.
One final alert: coinciding with this issue, Nicholas Hamilton has been promoted to deputy editor of Inside Reference Data, in well-deserved recognition of the expertise he now has in this subject matter and his excellence in translating developments and news for you. Congratulations to him.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Semantic density: old wine, or a new vintage?
Giving AI agents enough context to carry out enterprise tasks has become a priority for firms building them, but it’s expensive. It might not have to be.
Firms get AI access to LSEG data via DataBP admin layer
LSEG has expanded its agreement with DataBP to enable customers’ AI-based tools to request and evaluate data from the exchange and maintain more comprehensive usage records.
Rimes builds agents for exception management
The vendor aims to improve its data foundations to allow for greater agent autonomy.
The great migration: Firms work to integrate ISO 20022
Banks and asset managers are working to adopt the new messaging standard, but it’s easier said than done.
PostSig, CJC team up to run data management for London broker
In the first such deployment between the vendors, CJC will act as an outsourced data administrator using PostSig’s technology to manage the firm’s data.
Buy-side firms warn semantic layers not a quick fix for AI integration
Semantic layers promise to teach AI what a firm’s data means. Keeping that meaning current is the part that may get overlooked, tech heads warn.
Mind the stack: the foundation markets run on
Exchange data is an underappreciated component of the AI era, writes Jeff Kimsey.
BlackRock Aladdin prioritizing semantic layer for agentic AI
The asset manager’s tech platform is spending “a lot of time thinking about” semantics before it rolls out AI for a variety of tasks, says Aladdin exec.