August 2017: Another Example of Our Industry Growing Up
The unbundling of research will present new challenges for the industry, but on balance, it should be good.
The countdown to January 3 next year—the day the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II) hits the European statute books—is now well and truly under way. As this magazine has reported over the past number of years, the implications for all capital markets firms with respect to complying with the Directive are far-reaching. One of the most significant changes under Mifid II pertains to the relationship between buy-side firms and their research providers. Come the first working day of next year, buy-side firms will for the first time be required by law to purchase all their research and separate their research and execution functions, which have in most cases been provided by the same entities. What this means in practice is that where buy-side firms had been inundated by free research from specialist providers, research aggregators and sell-side firms, they now need to select and pay for the research they choose to receive, and they need to disclose what they are paying for, why they are paying for it, how much they are paying for it, and where the payment is coming from.
Currently, buy-side firms are in the somewhat luxurious position of not having to pay for any research. It’s akin to walking up and down the aisles of a superstore and helping yourself to anything and everything that catches your eye, although in this scenario, nothing is priced. Who said there is no such thing as a free lunch?
So, not only is the research free-for-all coming to an abrupt end, but research providers are going to have to start working out how exactly they are going to price their research.
What’s clear is that the market is set for massive upheaval. It’s impossible to get an accurate figure on the number of research providers serving the European capital markets—I’ve heard estimates ranging from approximately 1,000 to over 4,000—but what I am sure about is that come the end of next year, that number will be significantly smaller. In fact, one buy-side CIO I spoke to recently believes that his organization might whittle its research providers down from “hundreds” to a core of only five. Yes, things are about to get hairy in research land.
Is the unbundling of research and brokerage commissions a good thing? On balance, I think it probably is. After all, providing end-investors with greater transparency into what they are paying for in terms of asset management fees is long overdue. That is one of Mifid II’s central tenets. But I can’t imagine that the sell side and specialist producers are looking forward to the new dispensation with excitement. And how they are going to fairly price a commodity that they’ve been throwing at the buy side for years is anyone’s guess. That’s a circle they will all struggle to square.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
CME rankles market data users with licensing changes
The exchange began charging for historically free end-of-day data in 2025, angering some users.
Data heads scratch heads over data quality headwinds
Bank and asset manager execs say the pressure is on to build AI tools. They also say getting the data right is crucial, but not everyone appreciates that.
Reddit fills gaping maw left by Twitter in alt data market
The IMD Wrap: In 2021, Reddit was thrust into the spotlight when day traders used the site to squeeze hedge funds. Now, for Intercontinental Exchange, it is the new it-girl of alternative data.
Knowledge graphs, data quality, and reuse form Bloomberg’s AI strategy
Since 2023, Bloomberg has unveiled its internal LLM, BloombergGPT, and added an array of AI-powered tools to the terminal. As banks and asset managers explore generative and agentic AI, what lessons can be learned from a massive tech and data provider?
ICE launches Polymarket tool, Broadridge buys CQG, and more
The Waters Cooler: Deutsche Börse acquires remaining stake in ISS Stoxx, Etrading bids for EU derivatives tape, Lofthouse is out at ASX, and more in this week’s news roundup.
Fidelity expands open-source ambitions as attitudes and key players shift
Waters Wrap: Fidelity Investments is deepening its partnership with Finos, which Anthony says hints at wider changes in the world of tech development.
Data standardization key to unlocking AI’s full potential in private markets
As private markets continue to grow, fund managers are increasingly turning to AI to improve efficiency and free up time for higher-value work. Yet fragmented data remains a major obstacle.
Digital employees have BNY talking a new language
Julie Gerdeman, head of BNY’s data and analytics team, explains how the bank’s new operating model allows for quicker AI experimentation and development.