August 2018: Push the Boundaries, Baby
Pushing boundaries can lead to innovation and alpha, as long as the industry remains congnizant of where and how far they push.
At the time, the parenting advice racket was all about how mothers from other cultures are all far better at raising their children than American moms: Chinese Type-A tiger moms, Danish parents raising the happiest babies in the world, and—I am not making this up—Achtung Baby, a guide to raising self-reliant children, like German parents do. I admit I did not discover many practical suggestions, but one book offered a concept that stuck with me. Bringing Up Bébé is, of course, all about how to raise your kid like a French parent.
Its core philosophy is that parents should set and strictly enforce boundaries, but the trick is that from inside the confines of the rules, children have total freedom. In other words, parents set up the framework, but from within, the children get to determine what they do, create and become.
Our feature on data governance and innovation reminds me of the advice for parents of bébés. As regulations continue to roll out, some data leaders are concerned about how increasing governance could inhibit innovation. However, as Amelia Axelsen reports, there is a different view: that governance is an essential component to data innovation because otherwise, new applications are built on shaky, unreliable foundations.
Of course, innovation also involves pushing those boundaries. Max Bowie investigates approaches to cost management that are both creative themselves, but also free up the budget necessary to innovate. And I had a conversation with Chris Sharp, Old Mutual Global Investment’s head of data, breaking down how the firm’s data governance transformation, when coupled with a decision to outsource benchmark data management, has not only revolutionized the way it approaches data usage, but done wonders for its bottom line.
When regulators push boundaries, however, the results can be cumbersome for the market. Reporting for Risk.net, Sam Wilkes takes a magnifying glass to Mifid II, finding that in some areas, the regulation intended to increase transparency renders posttrade data more opaque than before. And Amelia Axelsen examines the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation to determine whether, when it comes to the goal of shedding light on shadow banking, SFTR is overkill.
On balance, it appears that setting boundaries and pushing past them is a net gain for the market, so we are likely to see innovators continue to repousser les limites.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Digital employees have BNY talking a new language
Julie Gerdeman, head of BNY’s data and analytics team, explains how the bank’s new operating model allows for quicker AI experimentation and development.
Can mastering data solve AI’s cognitive dissonance?
The IMD Wrap: Bank execs are still bullish on AI, but recent studies suggest it’s not the panacea they’re making it out to be. Can the two views be rectified?
Everything you need to know about market data in overnight equities trading
As overnight trading continues to capture attention, a growing number of data providers are taking in market data from alternative trading systems.
AI strategies could be pulling money into the data office
Benchmarking: As firms formalize AI strategies, some data offices are gaining attention and budget.
Identity resolution is key to future of tokenization
Firms should think not only about tokenization’s potential but also the underlying infrastructure and identity resolution, writes Cusip Global Services’ Matthew Bastian in this guest column.
Vendors are winning the AI buy-vs-build debate
Benchmarking: Most firms say proprietary LLM tools make up less than half of their AI capabilities as they revaluate earlier bets on building in-house.
Private markets boom exposes data weak points
As allocations to private market assets grow and are increasingly managed together with public market assets, firms need systems that enable different data types to coexist, says GoldenSource’s James Corrigan.
Banks hate data lineage, but regulators keep demanding it
Benchmarking: As firms automate regulatory reporting, a key BCBS 239 requirement is falling behind, raising questions about how much lineage banks really need.