Seeking A Third Way On Pricing

In our recently published special report on Pricing & Valuations, end-users of pricing services at firms such as Wells Fargo, Northern Trust and BNY Mellon all pointed to issues with transparency and credibility of pricing. Some end-users may want a concise and to-the-point documentation of pricing and valuation methods to feel they can trust a provider.
Others, however, take the approach of using secondary and even tertiary sources, and look at their own practices and techniques. This is the method advocated by Kerry White, global director of product strategy at BNY Mellon, both in the special report and additional conversations this past week.
White could be speaking to the providers when she says, "The best way to close the trust gap is by optimizing valuation practices and price modeling techniques." White relates that BNY Mellon is asked by its clients to provide those multiple valuations from different sources.
While the Dodd-Frank Act and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) in the US, along with European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), are increasing scrutiny of pricing and valuation, market volatility is also beginning to play a part, as White sees it, particularly for counterparty exposure and credit ratings data.
Regulations put firms and their providers "in the same boat," where prices have to be corrected immediately if necessary, she says. Everyone has to be prepared to deal with challenges to prices. Providers know that a lack of transparency can damage their relationship with firms that consume their pricing data, according to White.
Fair value requirements from GASB and the Dodd-Frank Act, still pending, could complicate the use of multiple valuation sources. "The regulations are about getting under the covers of how assets are behaving, and whether they are priced appropriately," says White.
Getting a succinct summary of pricing and valuation techniques may be a desirable goal, but that will be much more difficult to produce if multiple, more complex valuation methods become necessary. This may be the next great challenge in pricing and valuations. Reconciling competing impulses to be brief and comprehensive seems necessary to establish the trust and credibility sought after for pricing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.