Tick Size Pilot Program Launches
The SEC's project to better understand the impact of changing the tick size for securities of small-cap companies kicks off today.
The industry won't have a true grasp of the impact of the pilot until the data collected is analyzed, with the first report being released in April 2018. However, in the meantime, here's all you need to know about the program going forward:
WHAT: In short, the SEC is interested in understanding if changing tick sizes will improve liquidity for securities of small-cap companies. Regulators approved the Tick Size Pilot program's National Market System (NMS) plan on May 6, 2015. The program starts today.
WHY: Some believe smaller spreads have negatively impacted the amount of liquidity available for securities of small-cap firms. This program intends to shed more light on how a different market structure would affect those securities.
WHO: The program consists of 1600 securities broken up into four groups of 400 securities each.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) defines the four groups as follows:
- The control group will be quoted and trade at their current tick size increment.
- The first test group will be quoted in $0.05 increments, but will continue to trade at their current price increment.
- The second test group will be quoted and trade in $0.05 minimum increments, but would allow certain exemptions for midpoint executions, retail investor executions, and negotiated trades.
- The third test group will adhere to the requirements of the second test group, but will also be subject to a "trade-at" requirement. There will also be an exemption for block-size orders.
The entire list of participating securities can be found here.
WHEN: The program begins today, but real insight won't be gained from it until April 2, 2018, when participants publish a report assessing the impact of the pilot during its first year. The program ends Oct. 3, 2018. Finra published the program's entire timeline here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
American Bankers Assoc. asks SEC: Do you know what you’re doing?
The industry group disagrees severely with regulators’ interpretation of the Financial Data Transparency Act, hinting at possible legal action in a recently published comment letter.
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…
Off-channel messaging (and regulators) still a massive headache for banks
Waters Wrap: Anthony wonders why US regulators are waging a war using fines, while European regulators have chosen a less draconian path.
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
Chevron’s absence leaves questions for elusive AI regulation in US
The US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Chevron deference presents unique considerations for potential AI rules.
Aussie asset managers struggle to meet ‘bank-like’ collateral, margin obligations
New margin and collateral requirements imposed by UMR and its regulator, Apra, are forcing buy-side firms to find tools to help.
The costly sanctions risks hiding in your supply chain
In an age of geopolitical instability and rising fines, financial firms need to dig deep into the securities they invest in and the issuing company’s network of suppliers and associates.