Skip to main content

Are recordkeeping rules ripe for updates?

The Waters Wrap: SEC Rule 17a-4 appeared back on the SEC’s 2026 agenda two weeks ago. Some in the industry are hoping for relief, Reb writes.

Paul before Félix by William Hogarth
Credit: William Hogarth

I consider myself a decent recordkeeper. Journalists who aren’t, won’t last long. But what is the point of recordkeeping? In journalism, it’s accuracy, truth, and sometimes, legal defense. But I personally have the same instinct for it beyond work; I’ve kept many journals, and my iPhone’s camera roll dates back to my senior year of high school (2014, if you must know). It is an odd, and often impractical, compulsion to chronicle the past.

In finance, however, recordkeeping is a necessary burden

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Where a US antitrust case and a data law meet

The Waters Wrap: Regulators’ choice not to endorse a securities identifier under a new law keeps business as usual for firms required to pay Cusip license fees—but Reb isn’t ruling out a shake-up just yet.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here